Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Dec 17, 2025

📄 7% (0.07x) speedup for fignum_exists in lib/matplotlib/pyplot.py

⏱️ Runtime : 29.1 microseconds 27.2 microseconds (best of 28 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces a costly list-based membership check with an efficient set-based lookup for string figure identifiers in fignum_exists().

Key Change:

  • Added _figlabels_set() helper function that returns a set of figure labels instead of a sorted list
  • Modified fignum_exists() to use _figlabels_set() for string lookups instead of get_figlabels()

Why This Is Faster:
The original code called get_figlabels() for string membership checks, which performed three expensive operations:

  1. Retrieved all figure managers
  2. Sorted them by number (unnecessary for membership testing)
  3. Created a list and performed O(n) linear search with num in get_figlabels()

The optimized version uses _figlabels_set() which:

  1. Retrieves figure managers (same cost)
  2. Skips sorting entirely
  3. Creates a set for O(1) average-case membership lookup

Performance Impact:

  • Set creation from managers is O(n), but membership check is O(1) vs O(n) for lists
  • Eliminates sorting overhead (O(n log n)) when only checking existence
  • Test results show 16.9% improvement for non-existent string lookups, demonstrating the benefit for string-based figure identification

Behavior Preservation:

  • Integer lookups unchanged (still use fast dict lookup in has_fignum)
  • get_figlabels() maintains its sorted list contract for existing callers
  • All return values and error handling remain identical

This optimization is particularly beneficial when fignum_exists() is called frequently with string identifiers, as it eliminates unnecessary sorting and improves lookup complexity from O(n) to O(1).

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 62305 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 6 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_backend_bases.py::test_canvas_change 1.38μs 1.21μs 14.5%✅
test_figure.py::test_fignum_exists 13.5μs 12.9μs 4.38%✅
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
# imports
from matplotlib.pyplot import fignum_exists

# --- Function and helpers under test (copied/adapted from matplotlib source) ---


# Minimal fake Figure/Manager/Canvas classes to simulate behavior
class FakeFigure:
    def __init__(self, label):
        self._label = label

    def get_label(self):
        return self._label


class FakeCanvas:
    def __init__(self, fig):
        self.figure = fig


class FakeManager:
    def __init__(self, num, label):
        self.num = num
        self.canvas = FakeCanvas(FakeFigure(label))


# --- Basic Test Cases ---


def test_fignum_exists_with_nonexisting_int():
    # No figures at all
    codeflash_output = fignum_exists(42)  # 2.06μs -> 2.21μs (6.92% slower)


def test_fignum_exists_with_non_int_non_str():
    # Should not raise, but always False for unsupported types
    codeflash_output = fignum_exists(3.14)  # 4.69μs -> 4.00μs (17.2% faster)
    codeflash_output = fignum_exists(None)  # 1.19μs -> 1.00μs (18.3% faster)
    codeflash_output = fignum_exists((1, 2))  # 933ns -> 920ns (1.41% faster)
# imports
from matplotlib.pyplot import fignum_exists

# --- Minimal stubs and helpers to allow testing fignum_exists without matplotlib ---


# Minimal Figure and Manager classes to simulate the required interface
class DummyFigure:
    def __init__(self, label):
        self._label = label

    def get_label(self):
        return self._label


class DummyCanvas:
    def __init__(self, figure):
        self.figure = figure


class DummyManager:
    def __init__(self, num, label):
        self.num = num
        self.canvas = DummyCanvas(DummyFigure(label))


# -------------------- Basic Test Cases --------------------


def test_fignum_exists_with_non_existent_label_and_number():
    # No figures at all
    codeflash_output = fignum_exists(123)  # 2.07μs -> 2.17μs (4.48% slower)
    codeflash_output = fignum_exists("doesnotexist")  # 3.28μs -> 2.81μs (16.9% faster)

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-fignum_exists-mjah4kid and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization replaces a costly list-based membership check with an efficient set-based lookup for string figure identifiers in `fignum_exists()`.

**Key Change:**
- Added `_figlabels_set()` helper function that returns a set of figure labels instead of a sorted list
- Modified `fignum_exists()` to use `_figlabels_set()` for string lookups instead of `get_figlabels()`

**Why This Is Faster:**
The original code called `get_figlabels()` for string membership checks, which performed three expensive operations:
1. Retrieved all figure managers
2. **Sorted** them by number (unnecessary for membership testing)
3. Created a **list** and performed O(n) linear search with `num in get_figlabels()`

The optimized version uses `_figlabels_set()` which:
1. Retrieves figure managers (same cost)
2. **Skips sorting** entirely 
3. Creates a **set** for O(1) average-case membership lookup

**Performance Impact:**
- Set creation from managers is O(n), but membership check is O(1) vs O(n) for lists
- Eliminates sorting overhead (O(n log n)) when only checking existence
- Test results show 16.9% improvement for non-existent string lookups, demonstrating the benefit for string-based figure identification

**Behavior Preservation:**
- Integer lookups unchanged (still use fast dict lookup in `has_fignum`)
- `get_figlabels()` maintains its sorted list contract for existing callers
- All return values and error handling remain identical

This optimization is particularly beneficial when `fignum_exists()` is called frequently with string identifiers, as it eliminates unnecessary sorting and improves lookup complexity from O(n) to O(1).
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 December 17, 2025 20:38
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: Medium Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Dec 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: Medium Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant