⚡️ Speed up method OpenVINOTrainer.make_test_function by 19%
#220
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 19% (0.19x) speedup for
OpenVINOTrainer.make_test_functioninkeras/src/backend/openvino/trainer.py⏱️ Runtime :
22.1 microseconds→18.6 microseconds(best of48runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization achieves an 18% speedup by eliminating unnecessary function call overhead and streamlining the control flow in
make_test_function().Key optimizations:
Removed nested function calls: The original code created two separate inner functions (
one_test_stepandmulti_test_steps) and then assigned one totest_stepbased on condition. The optimized version uses a single conditional to directly define the appropriatetest_stepfunction, eliminating the intermediate function creation overhead.Inlined simple logic: For the single-step case, the logic
data = data[0]; return self.test_step(data)is kept inline rather than wrapped in a separateone_test_stepfunction, removing one layer of function call indirection.Simplified multi-step handling: The multi-step case now directly iterates over data without the extra
one_test_stepwrapper function, reducing function call overhead per iteration during test execution.Performance impact:
The line profiler shows the optimized version spends less time defining functions (23% vs 27.3% + 11.7% in the original), with the conditional check becoming the dominant operation at 23% vs 11.3% originally. The test results demonstrate consistent 10-27% improvements across various scenarios, with the largest gains in basic function creation cases.
Test case performance:
The optimization is particularly effective for:
This optimization is valuable since
make_test_function()is likely called during model training setup, and the reduced overhead during function creation and potential test step execution can accumulate over multiple training runs.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-OpenVINOTrainer.make_test_function-mjalr05zand push.