[test] Update linkedom 0.16.6 → 0.16.11 (minor)

[depfu]

---

Welcome to Depfu 👋

This is one of the first three pull requests with dependency updates we've sent your way. We tried to start with a few easy patch-level updates. Hopefully your tests will pass and you can merge this pull request without too much risk. This should give you an idea how Depfu works in general.

After you merge your first pull request, we'll send you a few more. We'll never open more than seven PRs at the same time so you're not getting overwhelmed with updates.

Let us know if you have any questions. Thanks so much for giving Depfu a try!

---

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ linkedom (0.16.6 → 0.16.11) · Repo

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 15 commits:

• 0.16.11
• Fixed: inspecting document.title deleted it as a side-effect (when cached) (#266)
• 0.16.10
• Updated worker.js after latest fix
• Fix issue #262 querySelector breaks when dom contains template attribute (#263)
• 0.16.9
• Updated devDependencies + fixed XML attributes escape
• Fix issue #260 escape for attributes in `XMLDocument`s (#261)
• 0.16.8
• Updated all opened PRs that made sense
• Implemented composedPath API and fixed canBubble argument of initEvent (#240)
• Added more correct default values for "click" method JS API (#242)
• textContent="" should clear all child nodes (#244)
• 0.16.7
• Fix #258 for real

↗️ htmlparser2 (indirect, 9.0.0 → 9.1.0) · Repo

Release Notes

9.1.0

Fixes

• Fixed onattribend's endIndex (#1540 by @DimaIT)
• Treat textarea as special tag (#1719 by @DimaIT)

Features

• Export QuoteType (#1543 by @DimaIT) and Handler interface (#1690 by @benkroeger)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

---

👉 No CI detected

You don't seem to have any Continuous Integration service set up!

Without a service that will test the Depfu branches and pull requests, we can't inform you if incoming updates actually work with your app. We think that this degrades the service we're trying to provide down to a point where it is more or less meaningless.

This is fine if you just want to give Depfu a quick try. If you want to really let Depfu help you keep your app up-to-date, we recommend setting up a CI system:

* [Circle CI](https://circleci.com), [Semaphore ](https://semaphoreci.com) and [Github Actions](https://docs.github.com/actions) are all excellent options. * If you use something like Jenkins, make sure that you're using the Github integration correctly so that it reports status data back to Github. * If you have already set up a CI for this repository, you might need to check your configuration. Make sure it will run on all new branches. If you don’t want it to run on every branch, you can whitelist branches starting with `depfu/`.

---

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands

@​depfu rebase

Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update

@​depfu recreate

Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it

@​depfu merge

Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved

@​depfu cancel merge

Cancels automatic merging of this PR

@​depfu close

Closes this PR and deletes the branch

@​depfu reopen

Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)

@​depfu pause

Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR

@​depfu pause [minor|major]

Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR

@​depfu resume

Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)