Skip to content

Tailor protocol paramaters safely for 10 parties - #2815

Merged
noonio merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
default-pparams-10-parties
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

Tailor protocol paramaters safely for 10 parties#2815
noonio merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
default-pparams-10-parties

Conversation

@v0d1ch

@v0d1ch v0d1ch commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

  • CHANGELOG updated or not needed
  • Documentation updated or not needed
  • Haddocks updated or not needed
  • No new TODOs introduced or explained herafter

v0d1ch added 2 commits August 10, 2026 16:33
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
@v0d1ch v0d1ch self-assigned this Aug 10, 2026
@v0d1ch
v0d1ch requested a review from a team August 10, 2026 14:43
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Transaction cost differences

No cost or size differences found

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

End-to-end benchmark differences

Comparing this PR (new) against master (old). Numbers come from cloud VMs, so changes under 5% are shown as and are likely run-to-run noise rather than a real regression or improvement. 🟢 = improvement, 🔴 = regression; uncolored rows are neutral measures reported for context.

Sustained load (3 nodes, 3x5000 txs)

Metric master PR Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s) 580.59 457.28 🔴 -123.31 (-21.2%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s) 1,078.19 865.28 🔴 -212.91 (-19.7%)
Backlog drain time (s) 25.40 30.10 🔴 +4.70 (+18.5%)
Snapshots per second (/s) 0.62 0.52 -0.10 (-16.1%)
Avg txs per snapshot 937.50 882.40 -55.10 (-5.9%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s) 21.024 26.150 🔴 +5.126 (+24.4%)
P50 confirmation (s) 22.313 27.846 🔴 +5.534 (+24.8%)
P95 confirmation (s) 25.393 32.191 🔴 +6.798 (+26.8%)
P99 confirmation (s) 25.695 32.319 🔴 +6.624 (+25.8%)
Tx validation time p50 (s) 8.409 9.104 🔴 +0.695 (+8.3%)
Peak node RSS (MB) 411.30 407.10 ≈ -4.20 (-1.0%)
Invalid txs 0.00 0.00 ≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Plateau 1000 UTxO (1 node, 4000 txs)

Metric master PR Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s) 232.38 216.56 🔴 -15.82 (-6.8%)
Backlog drain time (s) 17.10 18.40 🔴 +1.30 (+7.6%)
Snapshots per second (/s) 0.46 0.38 -0.08 (-17.4%)
Avg txs per snapshot 500.00 571.40 +71.40 (+14.3%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s) 10.635 11.784 🔴 +1.149 (+10.8%)
P50 confirmation (s) 11.068 13.591 🔴 +2.523 (+22.8%)
P95 confirmation (s) 17.149 18.358 🔴 +1.210 (+7.1%)
P99 confirmation (s) 17.154 18.368 🔴 +1.214 (+7.1%)
Tx validation time p50 (s) 5.260 5.369 ≈ +0.109 (+2.1%)
Peak node RSS (MB) 366.10 373.00 ≈ +6.90 (+1.9%)
Invalid txs 0.00 0.00 ≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Round-trip latency (3 nodes, closed-loop, 3x250 txs)

Metric master PR Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s) 94.21 101.24 🟢 +7.03 (+7.5%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s) 94.43 102.61 🟢 +8.18 (+8.7%)
Backlog drain time (s) 0.00 0.00 ≈ +0.00 (n/a%)
Snapshots per second (/s) 63.56 68.57 +5.01 (+7.9%)
Avg txs per snapshot 1.50 1.50 ≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s) 0.032 0.029 🟢 -0.002 (-7.0%)
P50 confirmation (s) 0.029 0.028 ≈ -0.001 (-2.4%)
P95 confirmation (s) 0.052 0.040 🟢 -0.011 (-22.1%)
P99 confirmation (s) 0.085 0.044 🟢 -0.040 (-47.6%)
Tx validation time p50 (s) 0.008 0.007 ≈ -0.000 (-3.8%)
Peak node RSS (MB) 148.00 150.10 ≈ +2.10 (+1.4%)
Invalid txs 0.00 0.00 ≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Transaction costs

Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.

Metadata
Generated at 2026-08-11 09:07:16.81438603 UTC
Max. memory units 14000000
Max. CPU units 10000000000
Max. tx size (kB) 16384

Script summary

Name Hash Size (Bytes)
νHead f2dd4ade71e19c2310a86215aa78aea06463aca2d8b818af8dc1b8a4 12805
μHead 4abb8dedbcd6a6f03f4fe227300e2713d73b7680d47baa898b60d27a* 4971
νDeposit c78e8c9205721eb3ef4410f3db9c6169fa6db497c24641d29c20529c 1615
νCRS 09db7ee6cf7a4b358dd5c8a2f19d2c048336ffc5a01ef35a47ca7072 2736
  • The minting policy hash is only usable for comparison. As the script is parameterized, the actual script is unique per head.

Init transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 5475 9.79 3.23 0.49
2 5575 9.78 3.21 0.50
3 5668 10.56 3.47 0.51
5 5861 11.22 3.66 0.53
10 6338 13.80 4.49 0.57
50 10182 35.13 11.15 0.96
100 14980 62.12 19.60 1.45
114 16324 69.69 21.96 1.59

Cost of Increment Transaction

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 2321 20.68 7.36 0.47
2 2456 21.63 8.33 0.49
3 2583 22.50 9.27 0.51
5 2845 25.22 11.48 0.56
10 3500 30.11 16.37 0.67
50 8739 70.91 55.78 1.51
75 12021 97.30 80.73 2.05

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 642 18.46 6.68 0.38
2 772 19.43 7.65 0.40
3 904 20.35 8.61 0.42
5 1167 22.30 10.56 0.46
10 1821 27.21 15.45 0.56
50 7063 67.90 54.84 1.40
75 10337 92.92 79.34 1.93

Close transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 665 17.76 11.66 0.41
2 804 18.76 12.65 0.43
3 928 19.71 13.62 0.45
5 1190 21.67 15.58 0.49
10 1849 26.62 20.49 0.59
50 7087 67.49 60.02 1.44
75 10365 94.00 84.99 1.98

Contest transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 701 21.48 14.90 0.46
2 836 22.66 15.94 0.49
3 964 23.81 16.97 0.51
5 1226 26.05 19.01 0.55
10 1880 31.74 24.15 0.66
50 7121 80.05 65.87 1.59
66 9218 98.62 82.35 1.95

FanOut transaction costs

Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
Rows first grow the UTxO set at a fixed 10 parties, then show the largest set that still fits per number of parties (burning more participation tokens leaves less room for outputs).

Parties UTxO UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
10 0 0 5644 23.29 42.87 0.90
10 1 57 5679 25.63 45.39 0.93
10 5 283 5812 35.88 55.71 1.10
10 10 570 5984 49.89 68.99 1.31
10 20 1139 6324 82.42 96.97 1.79
1 20 1139 6044 76.20 95.00 1.72
5 20 1136 6166 78.96 95.88 1.75
10 20 1140 6325 82.42 96.97 1.79
20 20 1136 6631 89.74 99.26 1.88
50 15 854 7394 94.70 91.88 1.90

PartialFanOut transaction costs

Largest chunk of ada-only outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Total UTxO Distributed UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
11 10 570 983 34.91 66.33 0.95
25 23 1307 1426 68.24 99.40 1.48
30 23 1308 1427 68.24 99.40 1.48
40 23 1310 1425 68.24 99.40 1.48
50 23 1308 1427 68.24 99.40 1.48
100 23 1308 1427 68.24 99.40 1.48
150 23 1310 1429 68.24 99.40 1.48
200 23 1308 1423 68.24 99.40 1.48
200 23 1311 1426 68.24 99.40 1.48

PartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Largest chunk of native-token outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Total UTxO Distributed UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
11 10 1090 1572 41.97 68.85 1.05
25 21 2415 2676 76.56 99.22 1.60
30 21 2289 2544 76.59 99.17 1.60
40 21 2226 2474 76.56 99.17 1.59
50 21 2373 2633 76.59 99.22 1.60
100 21 1953 2193 76.59 99.12 1.58
150 21 1953 2193 76.59 99.12 1.58
200 21 1974 2211 76.59 99.12 1.58
200 21 2247 2497 76.59 99.17 1.59

FinalPartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Terminal partial fanout step (FanoutProgress → Final) with outputs carrying a native token. Burns all head tokens and proves accumulator exhaustion via BLS proof.

Distributed UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 109 5529 21.97 44.27 0.89
5 575 5910 35.58 55.81 1.10
10 1090 6320 53.90 70.63 1.37
10 1060 6291 53.90 70.63 1.37

End-to-end benchmark results

This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.

Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.

Generated at 2026-08-11 09:11:43.506833324 UTC

Baseline Scenario

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 300
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 212.9
P99 216.5ms
P95 216.2ms
P50 213.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 155.7
End-to-end TPS 1370.28 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.2
Snapshots observed 3
Snapshots per second 13.70 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 100.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 142.6
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 2

Three local nodes

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 900
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 1029.1
P99 1101.8ms
P95 1098.9ms
P50 1046.5ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 467.0
End-to-end TPS 809.85 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 1.0
Snapshots observed 3
Snapshots per second 2.70 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 300.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 146.2
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 4

Scenario benchmark results

This page collects results from the scenario matrix: every combination of cluster size, UTxO shape, and incremental-ops mode is exercised by CI from the latest master code and reported below.

Numbers are approximate. They come from cloud VMs rather than controlled hardware, so the useful signal is the relative change between cells and between commits, not the absolute throughput.

Generated at 2026-08-11 09:24:53.230047467 UTC

Summary across cells

TPS columns are rates (transactions per second); Wall clock (s) is the measured elapsed time from the first tx submission to the last confirmation. Times are rounded to one decimal.

Scenario Txs Wall clock (s) End-to-end TPS (tx/s) Sustained TPS (tx/s) Avg conf (ms) P95 conf (ms)
Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget 30 0.0 891.17 n/a 32.8 33.4
Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid 30 0.2 177.44 177.83 5.6 6.5
Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget 30 0.0 831.11 n/a 35.1 35.8
Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid 30 0.2 135.89 134.60 7.3 9.6
Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget 30 0.0 845.06 n/a 34.6 35.2
Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid 30 0.2 146.76 143.45 6.7 9.7
Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget 60 0.1 949.20 n/a 61.9 62.6
Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid 60 0.5 116.70 113.89 16.9 24.7
Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget 60 0.1 716.18 n/a 82.0 82.9
Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid 60 0.8 76.32 76.87 26.0 37.2
Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget 60 0.1 768.55 n/a 76.7 77.2
Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid 60 0.7 86.55 82.96 22.9 32.4
Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget 90 0.1 705.92 n/a 122.9 127.1
Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid 90 0.9 101.21 99.01 29.3 37.7
Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget 90 0.2 538.92 n/a 162.8 165.6
Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid 90 1.4 65.79 66.39 44.8 66.2
Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget 90 0.1 601.50 n/a 146.7 148.1
Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid 90 1.2 77.86 75.65 37.9 49.7

Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 32.8
P99 33.4ms
P95 33.4ms
P50 33.0ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 18.3
End-to-end TPS 891.17 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 59.41 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 15.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 142.8
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 2

Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 5.6
P99 10.4ms
P95 6.5ms
P50 5.1ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 1.8
End-to-end TPS 177.44 tx/s
Sustained TPS 177.83 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 30
Snapshots per second 177.44 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.4
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 2

Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 35.1
P99 35.8ms
P95 35.8ms
P50 35.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 17.2
End-to-end TPS 831.11 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 55.41 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 15.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.9
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 31

Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 7.3
P99 11.6ms
P95 9.6ms
P50 7.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 1.9
End-to-end TPS 135.89 tx/s
Sustained TPS 134.60 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 30
Snapshots per second 135.89 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 144.2
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 31

Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 34.6
P99 35.2ms
P95 35.2ms
P50 34.8ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 17.9
End-to-end TPS 845.06 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 56.34 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 15.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.6
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 2

Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 6.7
P99 12.1ms
P95 9.7ms
P50 6.2ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 1.9
End-to-end TPS 146.76 tx/s
Sustained TPS 143.45 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 30
Snapshots per second 146.76 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 142.8
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 2

Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 61.9
P99 62.7ms
P95 62.6ms
P50 62.2ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 20.2
End-to-end TPS 949.20 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.1
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 31.64 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 30.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.5
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 3

Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 16.9
P99 28.9ms
P95 24.7ms
P50 15.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 4.5
End-to-end TPS 116.70 tx/s
Sustained TPS 113.89 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 60
Snapshots per second 116.70 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.7
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 3

Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 82.0
P99 82.9ms
P95 82.9ms
P50 82.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 25.0
End-to-end TPS 716.18 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.1
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 23.87 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 30.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 144.7
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 62

Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 26.0
P99 39.6ms
P95 37.2ms
P50 25.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 7.0
End-to-end TPS 76.32 tx/s
Sustained TPS 76.87 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 60
Snapshots per second 76.32 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 145.3
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 62

Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 76.7
P99 77.3ms
P95 77.2ms
P50 76.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 32.5
End-to-end TPS 768.55 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.1
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 25.62 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 30.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 142.9
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 3

Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 22.9
P99 36.0ms
P95 32.4ms
P50 23.0ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 6.0
End-to-end TPS 86.55 tx/s
Sustained TPS 82.96 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 60
Snapshots per second 86.55 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.3
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 3

Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 122.9
P99 127.2ms
P95 127.1ms
P50 123.1ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 56.7
End-to-end TPS 705.92 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.1
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 15.69 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 45.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 144.6
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 4

Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 29.3
P99 40.0ms
P95 37.7ms
P50 28.1ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 8.0
End-to-end TPS 101.21 tx/s
Sustained TPS 99.01 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 61
Snapshots per second 68.60 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.5
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.9
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 4

Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 162.8
P99 165.7ms
P95 165.6ms
P50 165.2ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 52.2
End-to-end TPS 538.92 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.2
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 11.98 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 45.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 144.6
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 0

Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 44.8
P99 73.3ms
P95 66.2ms
P50 43.6ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 11.8
End-to-end TPS 65.79 tx/s
Sustained TPS 66.39 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.1
Snapshots observed 63
Snapshots per second 46.05 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.4
Peak node RSS (MB) 145.8
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 0

Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 146.7
P99 148.1ms
P95 148.1ms
P50 147.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 44.8
End-to-end TPS 601.50 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.1
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 13.37 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 45.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.7
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 4

Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 37.9
P99 57.9ms
P95 49.7ms
P50 37.0ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 10.3
End-to-end TPS 77.86 tx/s
Sustained TPS 75.65 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 62
Snapshots per second 53.64 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.5
Peak node RSS (MB) 144.8
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 4

@noonio
noonio enabled auto-merge (squash) August 11, 2026 09:20
@noonio
noonio merged commit 73865d1 into master Aug 11, 2026
38 checks passed
@noonio
noonio deleted the default-pparams-10-parties branch August 11, 2026 09:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants