typst-agda-spec-4: Add the hydra-agda package (MAlonzo extraction) and CI gate

[noonio]

🧱 Stack (split of #2736)

1. typst-agda-spec-1: Forbid simultaneous commit and decommit in the head logic #2784 — protocol fix
2. typst-agda-spec-2: Migrate the specification prose from LaTeX to Typst #2785 — Typst prose migration
3. typst-agda-spec-3: Add the Agda formalisation of the specification #2786 — Agda formalisation + developer docs + changelog
   👉 4. typst-agda-spec-4: Add the hydra-agda package (MAlonzo extraction) and CI gate #2787 — hydra-agda package + CI
4. typst-agda-spec-5: Differentially test the node and validator against the Agda reference #2788 — agreement tests

Merge in order (1→5) into the typst-agda-stacked integration branch, then merge that branch into master as the final step.

---

Stacked PR 4/5 — splits #2736.
Base: typst-agda-spec-3 · Next: typst-agda-spec-5.

Package the decidable core of the Agda formalisation as Haskell so the node/tx
test suites can differentially test against it.

• hydra-agda: the committed MAlonzo extraction of Reference.agda /
  OffChainReference.agda plus the hand-written Hydra.Agda.* wrappers, with
  regenerate.sh.
• checks.hydra-agda-generated regenerates the extraction hermetically and
  fails on drift, so a semantic edit to the reference modules cannot leave the
  committed oracle stale.
• Exclude hydra-agda/generated from treefmt (machine-generated) and add the CI
  job that builds the spec and the extraction check.

Verified: nix build .#checks.x86_64-linux.hydra-agda-generated passes;
cabal build hydra-agda compiles; treefmt-clean.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[github-actions]

Transaction cost differences

No cost or size differences found

[github-actions]

End-to-end benchmark differences

Comparing this PR (new) against master (old). Numbers come from cloud VMs, so changes under 5% are shown as ≈ and are likely run-to-run noise rather than a real regression or improvement. 🟢 = improvement, 🔴 = regression; uncolored rows are neutral measures reported for context.

Sustained load (3 nodes, 3x5000 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	659.53	524.54	🔴 -134.99 (-20.5%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s)	1,250.97	1,016.46	🔴 -234.51 (-18.7%)
Backlog drain time (s)	22.30	27.90	🔴 +5.60 (+25.1%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	0.70	0.59	-0.11 (-15.7%)
Avg txs per snapshot	937.50	882.40	-55.10 (-5.9%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	18.351	23.193	🔴 +4.842 (+26.4%)
P50 confirmation (s)	19.433	24.525	🔴 +5.092 (+26.2%)
P95 confirmation (s)	22.408	28.135	🔴 +5.727 (+25.6%)
P99 confirmation (s)	22.548	28.283	🔴 +5.736 (+25.4%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	7.556	9.449	🔴 +1.893 (+25.1%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	420.20	428.00	≈ +7.80 (+1.9%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Plateau 1000 UTxO (1 node, 4000 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	272.63	234.95	🔴 -37.68 (-13.8%)
Backlog drain time (s)	14.60	16.90	🔴 +2.30 (+15.8%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	0.55	0.47	-0.08 (-14.5%)
Avg txs per snapshot	500.00	500.00	≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	9.133	10.612	🔴 +1.479 (+16.2%)
P50 confirmation (s)	9.980	12.663	🔴 +2.683 (+26.9%)
P95 confirmation (s)	14.614	16.918	🔴 +2.303 (+15.8%)
P99 confirmation (s)	14.615	16.919	🔴 +2.304 (+15.8%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	5.371	5.464	≈ +0.092 (+1.7%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	358.30	376.90	+18.60 (+5.2%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Round-trip latency (3 nodes, closed-loop, 3x250 txs)

Metric	master	PR	Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	87.58	103.88	🟢 +16.30 (+18.6%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s)	87.19	103.83	🟢 +16.64 (+19.1%)
Backlog drain time (s)	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)
Snapshots per second (/s)	59.20	69.94	+10.74 (+18.1%)
Avg txs per snapshot	1.50	1.50	≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s)	0.034	0.029	🟢 -0.005 (-15.6%)
P50 confirmation (s)	0.024	0.028	🔴 +0.005 (+19.1%)
P95 confirmation (s)	0.094	0.037	🟢 -0.057 (-60.7%)
P99 confirmation (s)	0.147	0.042	🟢 -0.105 (-71.3%)
Tx validation time p50 (s)	0.006	0.007	🔴 +0.001 (+21.7%)
Peak node RSS (MB)	149.10	149.20	≈ +0.10 (+0.1%)
Invalid txs	0.00	0.00	≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

[github-actions]

Transaction costs

Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.

Metadata
Generated at	2026-08-07 16:31:16.1473449 UTC
Max. memory units	14000000
Max. CPU units	10000000000
Max. tx size (kB)	16384

Script summary

Name	Hash	Size (Bytes)
νHead	f2dd4ade71e19c2310a86215aa78aea06463aca2d8b818af8dc1b8a4	12805
μHead	4abb8dedbcd6a6f03f4fe227300e2713d73b7680d47baa898b60d27a*	4971
νDeposit	c78e8c9205721eb3ef4410f3db9c6169fa6db497c24641d29c20529c	1615
νCRS	09db7ee6cf7a4b358dd5c8a2f19d2c048336ffc5a01ef35a47ca7072	2736

• The minting policy hash is only usable for comparison. As the script is parameterized, the actual script is unique per head.

Init transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	5473	9.16	3.00	0.49
2	5569	9.82	3.22	0.50
3	5668	10.37	3.39	0.51
5	5865	11.40	3.72	0.53
10	6341	14.16	4.62	0.58
50	10184	35.31	11.22	0.96
100	14982	62.00	19.56	1.45
114	16326	69.49	21.89	1.59

Cost of Increment Transaction

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	2321	21.15	7.52	0.48
2	2452	21.63	8.33	0.49
3	2583	22.74	9.35	0.52
5	2850	24.97	11.40	0.56
10	3501	30.21	16.40	0.67
50	8745	72.88	56.40	1.53
75	12017	97.82	80.87	2.05

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	643	18.46	6.68	0.38
2	773	19.40	7.64	0.40
3	903	20.37	8.62	0.42
5	1167	22.31	10.57	0.46
10	1821	27.21	15.45	0.56
50	7063	67.47	54.72	1.40
75	10338	93.00	79.36	1.93

Close transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	669	17.76	11.66	0.41
2	800	18.74	12.64	0.43
3	927	19.69	13.61	0.45
10	1849	26.57	20.47	0.59
50	7094	67.85	60.11	1.44
75	10366	93.26	84.78	1.97

Contest transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	697	21.48	14.90	0.46
2	832	22.64	15.93	0.48
3	964	23.75	16.95	0.51
5	1225	26.07	19.02	0.55
10	1881	31.85	24.18	0.66
50	7121	79.93	65.84	1.58
66	9222	99.48	82.59	1.96

FanOut transaction costs

Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
Rows first grow the UTxO set at a fixed 10 parties, then show the largest set that still fits per number of parties (burning more participation tokens leaves less room for outputs).

Parties	UTxO	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
10	0	0	5645	23.29	42.87	0.90
10	1	56	5677	25.63	45.39	0.93
10	5	284	5814	35.88	55.71	1.10
10	10	570	5985	49.89	68.99	1.31
10	20	1138	6323	82.42	96.97	1.79
1	20	1137	6043	76.20	95.00	1.72
5	20	1138	6168	78.96	95.88	1.75
10	20	1138	6322	82.42	96.97	1.79
20	20	1136	6630	89.74	99.26	1.88
50	15	854	7394	94.70	91.88	1.90

PartialFanOut transaction costs

Largest chunk of ada-only outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Total UTxO	Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
11	10	570	987	34.91	66.33	0.95
25	23	1310	1429	68.24	99.40	1.48
30	23	1305	1424	68.24	99.40	1.48
40	23	1309	1428	68.24	99.40	1.48
50	23	1307	1426	68.24	99.40	1.48
100	23	1309	1428	68.24	99.40	1.48
150	23	1309	1428	68.24	99.40	1.48
200	23	1310	1429	68.24	99.40	1.48
200	23	1311	1430	68.24	99.40	1.48

PartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Largest chunk of native-token outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Total UTxO	Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
11	10	1190	1686	42.00	68.90	1.06
25	21	1953	2192	76.59	99.12	1.58
30	21	2079	2324	76.56	99.12	1.59
40	21	2415	2676	76.59	99.22	1.60
50	21	2100	2347	76.56	99.12	1.59
100	21	2268	2523	76.59	99.17	1.60
150	21	2205	2457	76.59	99.17	1.59
200	21	2310	2567	76.59	99.22	1.60
200	21	2331	2589	76.56	99.21	1.60

FinalPartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Terminal partial fanout step (FanoutProgress → Final) with outputs carrying a native token. Burns all head tokens and proves accumulator exhaustion via BLS proof.

Distributed	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	119	5539	22.10	44.31	0.89
5	465	5800	35.70	55.82	1.10
10	990	6221	53.78	70.57	1.37
10	1030	6260	53.90	70.62	1.37

End-to-end benchmark results

This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.

Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.

Generated at 2026-08-07 16:32:12.314896942 UTC

Baseline Scenario

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	300
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	195.5
P99	198.0ms
P95	197.8ms
P50	195.8ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	125.7
End-to-end TPS	1485.18 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	3
Snapshots per second	14.85 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	100.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	143.6
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Three local nodes

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	900
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	966.3
P99	1024.7ms
P95	1023.8ms
P50	986.5ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	468.0
End-to-end TPS	870.58 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	1.0
Snapshots observed	3
Snapshots per second	2.90 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	300.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	148.1
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Scenario benchmark results

This page collects results from the scenario matrix: every combination of cluster size, UTxO shape, and incremental-ops mode is exercised by CI from the latest master code and reported below.

Numbers are approximate. They come from cloud VMs rather than controlled hardware, so the useful signal is the relative change between cells and between commits, not the absolute throughput.

Generated at 2026-08-07 16:46:29.745379496 UTC

Summary across cells

TPS columns are rates (transactions per second); Wall clock (s) is the measured elapsed time from the first tx submission to the last confirmation. Times are rounded to one decimal.

Scenario	Txs	Wall clock (s)	End-to-end TPS (tx/s)	Sustained TPS (tx/s)	Avg conf (ms)	P95 conf (ms)
Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget	30	0.0	855.99	n/a	34.3	34.8
Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	175.82	175.84	5.6	7.4
Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget	30	0.0	823.68	n/a	35.4	36.1
Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	136.28	137.88	7.3	11.8
Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget	30	0.0	854.48	n/a	34.3	34.8
Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid	30	0.2	150.16	148.72	6.6	9.3
Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget	60	0.1	599.89	n/a	98.2	99.6
Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid	60	0.5	123.50	123.12	16.0	21.6
Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget	60	0.1	762.51	n/a	76.3	77.7
Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid	60	0.7	82.91	83.73	23.9	30.9
Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget	60	0.1	754.92	n/a	77.4	78.4
Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid	60	0.7	89.22	85.19	22.2	31.4
Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget	90	0.1	673.10	n/a	127.2	133.2
Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid	90	0.9	99.86	102.22	29.5	37.6
Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget	90	0.2	574.86	n/a	152.3	155.2
Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid	90	1.4	66.59	68.57	43.1	66.1
Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget	90	0.2	573.63	n/a	153.5	155.6
Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid	90	1.1	78.60	77.00	37.4	48.5

Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	34.3
P99	34.8ms
P95	34.8ms
P50	34.5ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	12.6
End-to-end TPS	855.99 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	57.07 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.8
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	5.6
P99	10.7ms
P95	7.4ms
P50	5.2ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	1.8
End-to-end TPS	175.82 tx/s
Sustained TPS	175.84 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	175.82 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.6
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	35.4
P99	36.2ms
P95	36.1ms
P50	35.6ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	18.3
End-to-end TPS	823.68 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	54.91 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.2
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	31

Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	7.3
P99	12.0ms
P95	11.8ms
P50	6.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	1.8
End-to-end TPS	136.28 tx/s
Sustained TPS	137.88 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	136.28 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.5
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	31

Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	34.3
P99	34.9ms
P95	34.8ms
P50	34.5ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	22.8
End-to-end TPS	854.48 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	56.97 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	15.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	30
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	6.6
P99	11.0ms
P95	9.3ms
P50	6.2ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	1.8
End-to-end TPS	150.16 tx/s
Sustained TPS	148.72 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	30
Snapshots per second	150.16 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.1
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	2

Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	98.2
P99	99.6ms
P95	99.6ms
P50	98.5ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	65.1
End-to-end TPS	599.89 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	20.00 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	16.0
P99	23.6ms
P95	21.6ms
P50	15.4ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	4.5
End-to-end TPS	123.50 tx/s
Sustained TPS	123.12 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	123.50 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	76.3
P99	78.1ms
P95	77.7ms
P50	76.8ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	23.4
End-to-end TPS	762.51 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	25.42 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.1
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	62

Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	23.9
P99	35.8ms
P95	30.9ms
P50	23.1ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	6.2
End-to-end TPS	82.91 tx/s
Sustained TPS	83.73 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	82.91 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	62

Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	77.4
P99	78.9ms
P95	78.4ms
P50	77.8ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	28.8
End-to-end TPS	754.92 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	25.16 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	30.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	2
Number of txs	60
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	22.2
P99	34.6ms
P95	31.4ms
P50	21.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	6.9
End-to-end TPS	89.22 tx/s
Sustained TPS	85.19 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	60
Snapshots per second	89.22 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.5
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	3

Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	127.2
P99	133.3ms
P95	133.2ms
P50	126.0ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	42.3
End-to-end TPS	673.10 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	14.96 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	29.5
P99	41.0ms
P95	37.6ms
P50	29.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	8.0
End-to-end TPS	99.86 tx/s
Sustained TPS	102.22 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	61
Snapshots per second	67.68 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.5
Peak node RSS (MB)	144.3
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	152.3
P99	155.3ms
P95	155.2ms
P50	154.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	53.4
End-to-end TPS	574.86 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	12.77 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.5
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	0

Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	43.1
P99	73.3ms
P95	66.1ms
P50	42.0ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	11.6
End-to-end TPS	66.59 tx/s
Sustained TPS	68.57 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.1
Snapshots observed	64
Snapshots per second	47.35 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.4
Peak node RSS (MB)	147.4
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	0

Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	153.5
P99	155.7ms
P95	155.6ms
P50	154.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	58.5
End-to-end TPS	573.63 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.2
Snapshots observed	2
Snapshots per second	12.75 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	45.0
Peak node RSS (MB)	145.4
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4

Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	90
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	37.4
P99	52.0ms
P95	48.5ms
P50	37.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms)	10.2
End-to-end TPS	78.60 tx/s
Sustained TPS	77.00 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s)	0.0
Snapshots observed	62
Snapshots per second	54.14 /s
Avg txs per snapshot	1.5
Peak node RSS (MB)	146.0
Number of Invalid txs	0
Fanout outputs	4