docs: follow up on #826 review items - #829
Conversation
Add re-annotated metabolomics SDRFs for lc-ms validation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Up to standards ✅🟢 Issues
|
Summary
characteristics[tissue supergroup]as an optional shared sample metadata field in the spec terms registrycomment[sdrf template]values in thePXD073289AB Sciex example so CI detectsdia-acquisition.raw.zipcan already be recorded directly incomment[data file]Context
These are the immediate follow-up fixes identified during the review of #826 after the release-style merge landed on
master. The original review called outtissue supergroupas a forward reference; this PR now formalizes it instead of dropping it.Validation
parse_sdrf validate-sdrf --sdrf_file examples/PXD073289/PXD073289.sdrf.tsv --template dia-acquisition --use_ols_cache_onlygit diff --check