[e2e] encryption key related dtos - #64
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 17 minutes Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe change adds reusable versioned public-key metadata to device and mobile request models. It increases phone-number validation limits and expands README coverage for features, errors, configuration, APIs, contacts, and acknowledgments. ChangesClient model and documentation updates
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
15eb653 to
9406469
Compare
70d0ce6 to
001d392
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 185-192: Add the missing
github.com/android-sms-gateway/client-go/rest import to the README Go example
containing rest.IsBadRequest and rest.IsServerError, or explicitly mark the
snippet as a continuation if imports are intentionally omitted.
- Line 216: Update the README text describing Config.Validate() to state that
validation requires at least one non-empty authentication value and explicitly
accepts partial Basic Auth credentials.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: de308ae3-ab3b-4adf-a039-b93342027f15
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.mdsmsgateway/domain_devices.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- smsgateway/domain_devices.go
ef4aef6 to
27de6c9
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit