Feature/bruno gabriel araujo lebtag

[brlebtag]

Development Report:

it's been a while since I have used C++ more extensive than, saying, for small applications. I am also not aware of all C++ best practice (although I know some like RAII, even though I did not used it).

Initially I went full force in creativity but soon I realized that many ideas I tried to used (from c#) would not work here. I also got a bit scare whether I would be able to make through (because it's been a while I don't use C++). I decided to implement the solution (in c++) without worrying about anything except solving the problem.

After I sucessfully solved the problem (which I did not included into my commits). I went back to the code and tried to improve the quality of my code. I usually make strong use of names and relationships presented in the business domain in the code. But I failed to extract valuable names and relationship in this problem. I also make strong use of Interfaces, which helps to improve testability. But it is a bit weird in C++, so I was only able to use a little bit. And I also did not try to implement tests.

I personally do not use comments and in my job we use comments only when necessary. So my code is not very commented. However, I tend to implement very small functions with very self-explanatory names (and variables). I believe the best documentation is the code.

I had some problems related to undefined reference when I started using static functions, thus I had to remove the translation units. I moved all the code to header files. I did not like it but I did not find the solution to this problem. So I skipped it.