Conversation
Follow-up to aiming-lab#316: opt-in features that aren't advertised tend to stay unused. Documents the nine settings in the example config, with the reviewer fields written out explicitly (empty = current behaviour) and the debate/tournament ones commented out. Scope is limited to what is actually wired up on main, which is narrower than the engines can do: debate and the tournament are documented for Stage 8 only, and there is no reasoning_effort setting. Also records the non-obvious parts a user cannot infer from field names — that the tournament takes priority over debate on Stage 8, that a debate panel needs >= 2 distinct models after deduplication or it silently falls back to the single-model path, and the four ARC_* env overrides. Verified by parsing the example config through RCConfig: reviewer_model empty, debate_enabled and tournament_enabled False — the documented defaults match what the loader produces. No code changes. Full suite: 2951 passed, 0 failed, 56 skipped. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Jacky628
added a commit
to Jacky628/AutoResearchClaw
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Documents the nine reviewer, debate, and tournament settings in
config.researchclaw.example.yamlafter #316. The scope matches the current Stage 8 wiring; #318 extends the stage coverage separately.The comments explain tournament precedence, environment overrides, and the actual single-model behavior: a one-model panel still enters the debate engine with all roles assigned to that model. They also clarify that a reviewer model can participate in the panel, so differing from the primary model alone does not establish judge independence.
Validation: parsed the original and updated YAML and confirmed that the configuration values are identical. The reviewer remains unset and debate/tournament remain disabled by default.