-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Optimize header layout performance with flexbox mixins #6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: header-layout-optimization-pre
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Optimize header layout performance with flexbox mixins #6
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces new Sass flexbox mixins and refactors existing stylesheet components to migrate from float-based layouts to flexbox-based layouts. Changes include adding flexbox utility mixins, replacing float declarations with flexbox properties, adjusting spacing and alignment across multiple component stylesheets, and removing deprecated float-based layout patterns. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/topic-post.scss (1)
263-305: Incomplete flexbox migration: nested floats remain in flex container.While
.small-actionis now a flex container, its children.topic-avatar(line 270) and.small-action-desc>.avatar(line 298) still usefloat: left. These floats inside a flex container may cause layout conflicts or unexpected behavior.To complete the flexbox migration, remove the float declarations from:
- Line 270:
.topic-avatar { float: left; }- Line 298:
.avatar { float: left; }And adjust their alignment using flexbox properties instead. Also review the
button { float: right; }at line 309 — it should likely usemargin-left: autoor flex ordering instead..small-action { @include flexbox(); @include align-items(center); .topic-avatar { padding: 5px 0; border-top: none; - float: left; i { font-size: 35px; width: 45px; text-align: center; color: lighten($primary, 75%); } } .small-action-desc { padding: 0 1.5%; text-transform: uppercase; font-weight: bold; font-size: 0.9em; color: lighten($primary, 50%); .custom-message { text-transform: none; margin: 15px 0px 5px; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; p { margin: 0; } } .avatar { margin-right: 0.8em; - float: left; } > p { margin: 0; } } button { background: transparent; border: 0; - float: right; + margin-left: auto; } - clear: both; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/header.scss(2 hunks)app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/topic-post.scss(3 hunks)app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/topic.scss(1 hunks)app/assets/stylesheets/common/components/badges.css.scss(1 hunks)app/assets/stylesheets/common/foundation/mixins.scss(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/assets/stylesheets/common/foundation/mixins.scss (1)
100-131: Flexbox mixins are well-structured and comprehensive.The new flexbox, inline-flex, align-items, and order mixins provide solid vendor-prefix coverage for cross-browser compatibility. The mixin design facilitates consistent flexbox adoption across the codebase.
app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/header.scss (2)
14-19: Verify that floated children of flex container don't cause layout issues.While
.contentsis now a flex container with@include flexbox()and@include align-items(center), the child elements.login-button(line 43) and.icons(line 54) still usefloat: left. Floats in flex containers may behave unexpectedly and could disrupt the intended layout.Consider either:
- Removing floats from
.login-button,.icons, and their children (> liat line 60) and using flexbox properties instead- Documenting why floats are retained alongside flexbox
Please verify the visual layout is as intended and that floats aren't causing unintended side effects.
35-40: Flexbox layout correctly applied to .panel with margin-left and order.The combination of
margin-left: autoand@include order(3)is the correct approach for right-aligning a flex item. This is a significant improvement overfloat: right.app/assets/stylesheets/common/components/badges.css.scss (1)
54-58: Clean migration to flexbox mixins.The replacement of
display: inline-flex;andalign-items: baseline;with their mixin equivalents is correct and aligns well with the PR's standardization goal. No layout conflicts detected.app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/topic.scss (2)
29-37: Verify parent container has flexbox enabled for order() to work.Line 30 applies
@include order(2)to.extra-info-wrapper, but there's no@include flexbox()visible on.extra-info-wrapperitself. For theorderproperty to have any effect, the parent element must be a flex container.Confirm that
.extra-info-wrapper's parent element (likely.topic-titleor a sibling container) has@include flexbox()applied. If not, theorder(2)declaration will have no effect.Additionally, the AI summary indicates that
margin-top: 5pxwas removed from.badge-wrapper.bullet, but line 13 in the code still shows this property. Please clarify whether this removal was intentional or if the code snapshot is incomplete.
29-37: line-height adjustment appears isolated.The addition of
line-height: 1.5on line 32 appears disconnected from the flexbox migration. Please document the rationale—is this adjustment required for the flexbox layout, or is it an unrelated styling refinement?
| @mixin align-items($alignment) { | ||
| -webkit-box-align: $alignment; | ||
| -webkit-align-items: $alignment; | ||
| -ms-flex-align: $alignment; | ||
| -ms-align-items: $alignment; | ||
| align-items:$alignment; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor formatting inconsistency in align-items mixin.
Line 122 is missing a space after the colon, inconsistent with other properties in this and neighboring mixins.
@mixin align-items($alignment) {
-webkit-box-align: $alignment;
-webkit-align-items: $alignment;
-ms-flex-align: $alignment;
-ms-align-items: $alignment;
- align-items:$alignment;
+ align-items: $alignment;
}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In app/assets/stylesheets/common/foundation/mixins.scss around lines 117 to 123,
the align-items mixin has a formatting inconsistency: the final property uses
"align-items:$alignment;" without a space after the colon. Update that line to
include a space ("align-items: $alignment;") to match the spacing style used in
the other properties and neighboring mixins.
Test 5
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.
Replicated from ai-code-review-evaluation/discourse-coderabbit#5