EDM Proxy Concept, main branch (2025.12.17.)#345
Draft
krasznaa wants to merge 1 commit intoacts-project:mainfrom
Draft
EDM Proxy Concept, main branch (2025.12.17.)#345krasznaa wants to merge 1 commit intoacts-project:mainfrom
krasznaa wants to merge 1 commit intoacts-project:mainfrom
Conversation
So that client code using C++20(+) would be able to write code that specifically operates on top of proxy objects.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Introduced
vecmem::edm::concepts::proxy. So that client code using C++20(+) would be able to write code that specifically operates on top of proxy objects.This was triggered by a debug session with @niermann999 about 2 weeks ago, where a container was passed to a function that was expecting to get a single proxy object. With the compiler errors being very unhelpful about where the issue was.
I didn't yet decide how to best test the code in the CI, so let's leave it as a draft for the moment...