docs: fix comments

[exKAZUu]

Close #

Self Check

• I've confirmed All checks have passed on this page.
  • PR title follows Angular's commit message format.
  • PR title doesn't have WIP:.
  • The test command (e.g., yarn test) passed.
  • The lint command (e.g., yarn lint) passed.
  • You may leave this box unchecked due to long workflows.
• I've reviewed my changes on the GitHub diff view.
• I've written the steps to test my changes.
• I've added screenshots (if the UI changed).
  • You may leave this box unchecked if you didn't modify the UI.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @exKAZUu, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing code readability by refining a comment within the PrismaScripts class. The change clarifies the rationale behind a specific database management step, ensuring that the explanation accurately reflects the condition under which prisma migrate reset might fail, thereby improving maintainability and understanding for developers working with this script.

Highlights

• Documentation Clarity: Improved the clarity of a code comment related to Prisma database operations, specifically explaining why a database file is removed before running prisma migrate reset.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

プルリクエストありがとうございます。コメントの修正を確認しました。1点、修正されたコメントが元のコメントよりも曖昧になってしまっている可能性がある箇所を指摘させていただきました。ご確認いただけますと幸いです。

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR improves a comment in the deployForce method to better describe why the database file is removed before running prisma migrate reset. The original comment had both grammatical issues and was less accurate about what the code does.

• Fixes comment clarity: Changes "if the existing database schema" to "if the database exists" which better reflects that the entire database file is being removed, not just the schema

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

The comment has a grammatical issue. The phrase "sometimes fails if the database exists" is missing a word to make the sentence complete. It should read "sometimes fails if the database already exists" or "sometimes fails when the database exists" to be grammatically correct and clearer.

Suggested change

	// `prisma migrate reset` sometimes fails if the database exists, so we remove it first.
	// `prisma migrate reset` sometimes fails if the database already exists, so we remove it first.