Skip to content

Conversation

@rburema
Copy link
Member

@rburema rburema commented Oct 10, 2025

Before, this resulted in zits in areas that are just on the border between meeting the requirements for top surfaces and normal areas -- of which there may be a lot on certain combinations of curved models and settings.

I also had to increase the minimum line-length from the absolute minimum 5 micron to the (confusingly named in context) 'maximum resolution' setting. I think this is OK since we don't have to take into account the deviation at all, since we're working with co-linear points most of the time here. This could fix a few things as well -- but it also changes stuff, so test carefully.

We don't have to do the whole simplify thing here, since all points will be on a single line anyway -- maybe this is too big (I'd argue not, since this _is_ what the user asked for, though maybe you could say 'inter'line isn't the same), but _just_ using the 'any points within 5 micron are the same' rule here is not even close to enough to prevent zits.

done as part of CURA-12774 -- plz test carefully, this might change a bunch of things
This may result in zits in areas that are _just_ on the border between meeting the requirements for top surfaces and normal areas -- of which there may be a lot on certain combinations of curved models and settings.

part of CURA-12774
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 10, 2025

Test Results

28 tests  ±0   28 ✅ ±0   4s ⏱️ ±0s
 1 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0    0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 35be5d9. ± Comparison against base commit 3afd632.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants