Update translation: zh-CN (Simplified Chinese)

[op200]

Update Simple Chinese (zh-CN) translation

msgmerge pot(this branch)->po from branch feature (arch1t3cht), manual confirmation is correct

The translations of all functional options have been tested by me to ensure accuracy

• Complete the translation
  (The newly added part or untranslated part)

  e.g.
  Open Recent -> 最近打开
Visual Typesetting Tools Alpha -> 可视化绘图工具透明度
Skip over whitespace -> 跳过空行

• Revise a small amount of translations to use more contemporary language
  Standardize inconsistent translations throughout
  Uniform punctuation usage

  e.g.
  热键 -> 快捷键
偏好 -> 首选项
： -> :
字幕提供者 -> 字幕渲染器（subtitles provider）

[oborozuk1]

It looks like you added some personal annotations rather than strictly following the original text. Anyway, before discussing the content, I have a couple of questions:

• Why did you use the translation from version 3.2 as the base instead of 3.4?
• What is the purpose of using half-width punctuation instead of full-width in Chinese?
• Is it necessary to include the branch-related content (though it’s commented out)?

---

你的英语水平过关吗

[EL-File4138]

I will provide some review suggestions later, for now, I'm seeing:

• “时间轴” is roughly simplified to “时轴” (from a self-explanatory term to a dictionary entries style term);
• “计时” becomes “时轴” (covering "timing" with a more general "timestamp", which loses semantics precision);
• “特效标签” becomes "tag" (regression);
• Inconsistent "cursor": “文本光标”, “文本编辑光标”, “游标”
• Mixed zh-Hant term: framerate - “影格率”
• Commenting term from source language: “粗体版本(bold variant)”
• Incoherent proofreading: “在文本光标处分割 行” (one excessive space)

some from your example:

• "Skip over whitespace": only “空行”(empty line), or what the code intends to do, “空白” (which includes inline whitespace character sector)?

… also, as long as you're still using “喔唷，Aegisub娘崩溃啦！”, I feel it's still not very proper to remove the contribution remark from Vmoe Fansub.

Overall still a solid job, but it could use some more polish. Would be grateful if you could later respond to review comments.

[op200]

It looks like you added some personal annotations rather than strictly following the original text. Anyway, before discussing the content, I have a couple of questions:

* Why did you use the translation from version 3.2 as the base instead of 3.4?

* What is the purpose of using half-width punctuation instead of full-width in Chinese?

* Is it necessary to include the branch-related content (though it’s commented out)?

你的英语水平过关吗

1. branch master 提交比 branch 3.4 提前，为啥你说 master 是 3.2 ？package 里的版本号都是 3.4，我也是根据 master 生成的 pot
   我不清楚 Aegisub 的项目结构
2. 只有个别标点统一为了半角，有利于对齐
3. 子集 po 通过超集 po + 对应分支的 pot 生成，根本不需要关心注释

---

我的英语水平一坨，可喜可贺的是英语水平一坨翻译的句子能让新手一眼看懂，而不是原来某些

动名词都分不清的翻译

　

和

一句话用两句都表意不清的废话文学

　

并且我能找到的、且需要翻译的功能，我都使用了一遍，原文本身就含有大量的表意不清，须按照实际含义翻译，否则新手根本看不懂

[oborozuk1]

branch master 提交比 branch 3.4 提前，为啥你说 master 是 3.2 ？

我是说你的翻译用的是旧的（3.2 版本），而不是 3.4 修订过的

我最后那句话没有任何批评的意思，只是说你的 PR 我差点没看懂

[op200]

I will provide some review suggestions later, for now, I'm seeing:

* “时间轴” is roughly simplified to “时轴” (from a self-explanatory term to a dictionary entries style term);

* “计时” becomes “时轴” (covering "timing" with a more general "timestamp", which loses semantics precision);

* “特效标签” becomes "tag" (regression);

* Inconsistent "cursor": “文本光标”, “文本编辑光标”, “游标”

* Mixed zh-Hant term: framerate - “影格率”

* Commenting term from source language: “粗体版本(bold variant)”

* Incoherent proofreading: “在文本光标处分割 行” (one excessive space)

some from your example:

* "Skip over whitespace": only “空行”(empty line), or what the code intends to do, “空白” (which includes inline whitespace character sector)?

… also, as long as you're still using “喔唷，Aegisub娘崩溃啦！”, I feel it's still not very proper to remove the contribution remark from Vmoe Fansub.

Overall still a solid job, but it could use some more polish. Would be grateful if you could later respond to review comments.

I did not delete any info about Vmoe, I even kept the header info intact in the comments for possible future restoration

About original text, I think there are many unreasonable aspects: whitespace appeared in the 翻译助手, it will enter the next line when submitting

If you open the option Skip over whitespace, it will skip empty line

The original text have a large number of similar thing (bugs), so that's why feature based translation is needed instead of original text based translation

[op200]

branch master 提交比 branch 3.4 提前，为啥你说 master 是 3.2 ？

我是说你的翻译用的是旧的（3.2 版本），而不是 3.4 修订过的

我最后那句话没有任何批评的意思，只是说你的 PR 我差点没看懂

几乎无法直接合并，用 pot 重新生成 po 后，文本对比功能也废了，所以我手动跟 3.4 的 po 对比了一个多小时……

例如 karaoke timing 我原本的 po 就是 3.2 版本的 xxx 计时，我看到 3.4 的修改后，才修改的，我选择直接删除了这句翻译

关于 计时 时轴 时间 之类的翻译，原文是 time timing timer，非常混乱，例如我会把 timer （原译 计时器）翻译成 时轴，这是因为这个字符串出现的位置是顶部工具栏，这里的 时轴 泛指整个 时间轴处理 相关概念（功能），且整个工具栏除了 自动化 都是两个字，看起来也舒服

而 timing 就难以分清具体指代了，甚至连词性都无法从原文看出来，karaoke timing 我根本找不到在哪出现，也看不懂源码，所以为了防止错译就暂时删除了（未翻译的行直接能搜出来，错译的就麻烦了）

[EL-File4138]

whitespace appeared in the 翻译助手, it will enter the next line when submitting

So your understanding of what the toggle is doing is a bit off.
Skipping empty line is what the toggle additionally do, as the toggle is exactly made for "white space".

Please try:

• Enclose 2 part of text on one line with ass tag;
• Leave some space (character) between the groups;
• Try to translate using the tool; Switch the toggle on and off, see whether the whitespace part got picked up.

(I'll supplement a video later)

Please do not assume the source language is "faulty" before you can confidently support your acclaim with proper understanding of the functionality.

[oborozuk1]

几乎无法直接合并，用 pot 重新生成 po 后，文本对比功能也废了，所以我手动跟 3.4 的 po 对比了一个多小时……

或许你可以参考 git 的提交。

但 3.4 版本大部分新翻译都被改回去了，这部分还是有不少改进的，请见 #210。

karaoke timing 我根本找不到在哪出现

在 编辑 > 撤销，还有一处 combining 也是在这，原本翻译是错的。

[oborozuk1]

Translating "recombine" as "合并" may cause confusion with "join," as their behaviors are different.

[op200]

whitespace appeared in the 翻译助手, it will enter the next line when submitting

So your understanding of what the toggle is doing is a bit off. Skipping empty line is what the toggle additionally do, as the toggle is exactly made for "white space".

Please try:

* Enclose 2 part of text on one line with ass tag;

* Leave some space (character) between the groups;

* Try to translate using the tool; Switch the toggle on and off, see whether the whitespace part got picked up.

(I'll supplement a video later)

Please do not assume the source language is "faulty" before you can confidently support your acclaim with proper understanding of the functionality.

text	close	open
{some tags}	skip	skip
	not	skip
text	not	not

Now I understand your means, thank you for your reminder

Firstly, I had never noticed before that it treats tags as empty

Secondly, I know before that its function is to skip whitespace, 空行 != empty string. There was indeed an issue with my response above, it was my mistake

A few months ago, I translated it as 跳过空行 that has no problem, I don't know why I gave this translation as an e.g. in PR
Maybe my brain went down after not sleeping all night

[op200]

几乎无法直接合并，用 pot 重新生成 po 后，文本对比功能也废了，所以我手动跟 3.4 的 po 对比了一个多小时……

或许你可以参考 git 的提交。

但 3.4 版本大部分新翻译都被改回去了，这部分还是有不少改进的，请见 #210。

karaoke timing 我根本找不到在哪出现

在 编辑 > 撤销，还有一处 combining 也是在这，原本翻译是错的。

等我睡一觉后再核对一遍😭

已经感觉快4了

[op200]

Translating "recombine" as "合并" may cause confusion with "join," as their behaviors are different.

我想起来了，我可以先把 3.4 的 po 生成新 po，然后再做文本比较

唉woc😭白白浪费一两个小时

[op200]

Already fully cmp the 3.4 po

I thought that could finish soon, but it still took over an hour😭

Fortunately, made many necessary modifications to the translation

zh_CN.zip

org po + pot -> new 3.4 po
used for cmp

[oborozuk1]

Is that so? I still see some differences—were they intentional?

• 强制以 X 的比例显示视频画面 → 强制视频为X宽高比
• 退格：解除最后的连结 → 空格: 解除最后的连结 (This is incorrect. And you changed the translation of "link" from "连结" to "配对", but these instructions were left unchanged.)
• 字体没有正确的unicode映射时有用 → 字体没有合适的unicode映射时有用

[op200]

Is that so? I still see some differences—were they intentional?

* `强制以 X 的比例显示视频画面` → `强制视频为X宽高比`

* `退格：解除最后的连结` → `空格: 解除最后的连结` (This is incorrect. And you changed the translation of "link" from "连结" to "配对", but these instructions were left unchanged.)

* `字体没有正确的unicode映射时有用` → `字体没有合适的unicode映射时有用`

第一个 ratio 作为比值（系数）翻译，所以不写 :1，和后面的 msgid "Force video to a custom aspect ratio" msgstr "强制视频为自定义宽高比" 对应

第二个那一大段我没注意到……改了，连结 也都统一成 3.4 中使用的 配对 了（我说怎么按空格没反应捏）

第三个改成 "文字编码，仅当使用unicode时，字体没有正确的unicode映射时生效" 了

[oborozuk1]

Alright, now we've finally reached the first step, which is reviewing the translation. I agree with @EL-File4138's opinion. I'll go through your translation later again.

[oborozuk1]

I've reviewed these for now. I think we should discuss whether some annotations are really necessary or if we should follow the original text instead.

[EL-File4138]

Review of Change (1/3)

This review covers the first 2000 lines of only the changing part. The inherited part will be done separately.

[arch1t3cht]

I'm slowly getting back to Aegisub development after being busy with personal projects for a few months. What's the status of this language PR? I see some unresolved review comments, does everyone here agree this is ready to merge, or are there still disagreements?

[EL-File4138]

I would suggest putting it on hold if there isn't a recent plan to release a new version. I'm still consulting with a variety of zh-CN communities for feedback.

[op200]

I will resolve it when free
within 3 months at the latest

[0tkl]

这两天看到这个 PR 又有动静了，所以粗略过了一遍

[0tkl]

为啥第 6450-6522 行的这一批 message 被删掉了

[op200]

使用项目中生成 POT 的 sh 脚本生成的新 POT 中没有这些行，POT 生成 PO 后自动移除了，可能是我生成 POT 的方式不对（？

如果有必要加回去的话我手动加回去

[op200]

部分缺损可能是几个月前使用 pot 重生成 po 时导致的，这方面的问题提出的 conversation 将在每次 commit 时修正，目前绝大部分内容都修改过了，后面生成 po 的时候应该不会出现这个问题