-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
windowed tskit input #136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
molpopgen
wants to merge
26
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
windowed_tskit_input
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
windowed tskit input #136
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
26 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dc8ab6f
feat: windowed counts from tree sequence for single sample set
molpopgen 17a74b1
basic setup
molpopgen 945aa0e
copy/paste
molpopgen e867c94
take ownership of the window iterator
molpopgen 8201bee
failing test and setup fix
molpopgen eb55c11
minor klean
molpopgen cafe639
windows empty
molpopgen d4bde94
add empty counts
molpopgen eb22f0b
consume in order to validate early so that we can Err early if necessary
molpopgen dac6dea
simple test passes but there's no way this is correct
molpopgen 10e4ba8
back to fail
molpopgen c31c995
back to pass
molpopgen a132bfd
note
molpopgen 68ee67f
update python integration tests. (pass)
molpopgen 97fdd05
nice
molpopgen 6f30e22
revert
molpopgen 2f02f71
new py fn
molpopgen 978d60e
todo
molpopgen b7dd94f
I either found a bug or a logic error in my Python-side setup
molpopgen 62b3940
fmt
molpopgen 2b81bf5
pretty sure this is logic error on the Python side...
molpopgen 16c5b1a
BAM PASS
molpopgen 5ef0555
remove pytest import
molpopgen 2179719
validate windows
molpopgen 61059c0
fix
molpopgen 69e9420
fix
molpopgen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is O(n^2); surely there is a better way? It seems sufficient to verify the following:
Would this not be O(n)?