Skip to content

Conversation

Sahilagarwal623
Copy link

Description

Added System.out.println() statements to all methods in NearestElementTest.java so that test outputs can be seen in the console when running mvn test. Existing functionality is preserved and all assertions continue to pass.

Checklist

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized it.
  • All filenames are in PascalCase.
  • All functions and variable names follow Java naming conventions.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in their comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanations. (Not applicable for test modifications)
  • All new code is formatted with clang-format -i --style=file path/to/your/file.java. (Not applicable for test modifications)

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 75.80%. Comparing base (e6cb96f) to head (3daf78e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #6659      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     75.74%   75.80%   +0.05%     
- Complexity     5771     5793      +22     
============================================
  Files           702      704       +2     
  Lines         19770    19815      +45     
  Branches       3832     3844      +12     
============================================
+ Hits          14975    15020      +45     
  Misses         4215     4215              
  Partials        580      580              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Sahilagarwal623 Sahilagarwal623 marked this pull request as draft October 5, 2025 18:24
@Sahilagarwal623 Sahilagarwal623 marked this pull request as ready for review October 5, 2025 18:50
@DenizAltunkapan
Copy link
Member

@Sahilagarwal623 Please fix the failing workflows so I can start the review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants