Skip to content

Add InterviewId param to EfspConnection and ProxyConnection classes - #312

Merged
BryceStevenWilley merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
interview_id
Jul 23, 2026
Merged

Add InterviewId param to EfspConnection and ProxyConnection classes#312
BryceStevenWilley merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
interview_id

Conversation

@BryceStevenWilley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automatically get it from the docassemble context, if that's present.

The other part of SuffolkLITLab/EfileProxyServer#416, wrote it when testing the feature on the proxy server, so figured I should just make the PR.

@BryceStevenWilley
BryceStevenWilley force-pushed the interview_id branch 2 times, most recently from bd447a8 to cb30b17 Compare July 23, 2026 18:44
@nonprofittechy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The name "interviewID" is a little confusing. As I understand it, it's just the package plus interview filename. To me it sounds like it would be a session identifier.

What about: interviewName, interviewFilename, or interviewPath? (it's technically a prefixed filename)

@BryceStevenWilley
BryceStevenWilley force-pushed the interview_id branch 2 times, most recently from 1c3a20c to 6eeb25b Compare July 23, 2026 20:17
Automatically get it from the docassemble context, if that's present.
@BryceStevenWilley

BryceStevenWilley commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Went with interviewName, mostly because that's what we're using it as; it doesn't need to be the filename or the path, that's just the quickest way to get a unique, human readable name for the interview.

Interview is also a slight misnomer, since LITEfile is likely going to use this as well, but it's still clear enough I think, this is an internal thing that we don't have to really explain to end-users or justify to external clients (if there are any)

@BryceStevenWilley
BryceStevenWilley merged commit 411983c into main Jul 23, 2026
5 checks passed
@BryceStevenWilley
BryceStevenWilley deleted the interview_id branch July 23, 2026 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants