Skip to content

Explain DummySpectralCNN usage in GradCAM tests - #6

Closed
RaykKretzschmar with Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
dev-from
copilot/sub-pr-3-another-one
Closed

Explain DummySpectralCNN usage in GradCAM tests#6
RaykKretzschmar with Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
dev-from
copilot/sub-pr-3-another-one

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Dec 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Addressed review question about why tests use DummySpectralCNN instead of the real SpectralCNN model.

Response Summary

Explained the rationale for using a dummy model in unit tests:

  • Test isolation: Focuses on GradCAM functionality without SpectralCNN's full complexity (BatchNorm, multiple pooling layers, embeddings)
  • Test efficiency: Simpler model enables faster test execution
  • Controlled scenarios: Minimal architecture simplifies verification of layer detection, edge cases, and output shapes

Identified interface mismatch: SpectralCNN returns (logits, embedding) tuple while DummySpectralCNN returns only a tensor. Offered to align the dummy model with real model behavior if desired.


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Update Grad-CAM implementation and testing clarity Explain DummySpectralCNN usage in GradCAM tests Dec 9, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from RaykKretzschmar December 9, 2025 12:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants