-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
cpu/nrf5xcommon/qdec: allow configuration of count threshold for callback #22708
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
leandrolanzieri
wants to merge
3
commits into
RIOT-OS:master
Choose a base branch
from
leandrolanzieri:pr/cpu/nrf5xcommon/qdec_add_max_count
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+91
−11
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
53a629c
cpu/nrf5x_common/periph/qdec: extend counter and allow setting max value
leandrolanzieri ed788ff
drivers/periph/qdec: add note on maximum value configurability
leandrolanzieri d8abab1
tests/periph/qdec: adapt modded board to new configuration
leandrolanzieri File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how about keeping the overflow behaviour when callback_threshold is 0
reasoning:
EVENTS_REPORTRDY is time based (and count) -> less sleep
overflow will happen less often (depends on the only on the counted distance) -> has a real advantage
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mean that the user would get a callback when the count reaches 1024 or keep the software counter and call back every multiple of 1024? I'm not sure about how this would work.
Keep in mind that this PR also include the software counter.
We could have
callback_threshold = 0a sort of legacy mode that restricts count to +/- 1024 and only uses the overflow interrupt. Probably not the nicest API but it would cover both cases.Do you have any thoughts on that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my thought and reasoning is in the follow up comment
so yes I think it would be nice to have callback_threshold == 0 + callback function to behave like a legacy fallback (overflow only) to avoid the extra interrupts that might wake up the cpu and only have overflow interrupts)