doccheck: less exclude_simple

[kfessel]

Contribution description

reduce the number of warning excluded from reporting without recreating the entire file

probably a bunch of them just got fixed over time

some of them might no longer be reported due to documentation not build

steps to reproduce the original PR:

#in dist/tools/dockcheck

mv exclude_simple exclude_simple.o
sort exclude_simple.o| uniq - exclude_simple.o.u 
touch exclude_simple

./check.sh > exclude_simple.new
#remove filenames ( start print at "warning:)
sed -E -e "s#^.*(warning:)#\1#" <exclude_simple.new >exclude_simple.n

sort exclude_simple.n| uniq - exclude_simple.n.u
diff -U 0 exclude_simple.o.u exclude_simple.n > exclude_simple.diff
# next awk line was recreated using duck.ai after the original PR to replace
# the use of https://kfessel.github.io/JS-helpers/regexrunner.html
awk '/^-/ { print substr($0, 2) }' exclude_simple.diff > exclude_simple.filter 

grep -Fvf exclude_simple.filter exclude_simple.o > exclude_simple

Testing procedure

lets see what the ci says since this file is mostly for ci entertainment that should be good enough

maybe one likes to check if the documentation not build is something that plays into this

A AI review might focus on documentation not build

Issues/PRs references

#22512
#22327
#19240

Declaration of AI-Tools / LLMs usage:

AI-Tools / LLMs that were used are:

• none

[riot-ci]

Murdock results

✔️ PASSED

ae5b25b f: add some back

Success	Failures	Total	Runtime
1	0	1	01m:13s

Artifacts

• Documentation preview

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[crasbe]

Thank you for cleaning this up, please squash :)