Skip to content

Conversation

@NSFatalError
Copy link
Owner

@NSFatalError NSFatalError commented May 16, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed the dependency on the "swift-algorithms" package and cleaned up related references in the project.
    • Updated package dependencies to reflect the removal of "swift-algorithms" and changes to other packages.
  • Refactor
    • Replaced custom array filtering with standard Swift methods for improved consistency.
    • Introduced an internal helper function for generating Cartesian products in tests.
  • Style
    • Cleaned up unused import statements across several test files.

@NSFatalError NSFatalError self-assigned this May 16, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 16, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes remove the dependency on the external "swift-algorithms" package from the project. All associated imports and references to the "Algorithms" module are eliminated. A new internal helper for computing Cartesian products is introduced in the test helpers. Dependency resolution files and the package manifest are updated accordingly.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Package.resolved, Package.swift Removed "swift-algorithms" dependency and its references from the manifest and resolved dependencies.
Sources/Probing/Errors/ProbingErrors.swift Removed Algorithms import; replaced custom compacted() with standard compactMap(\.self) for optionals.
Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Helpers/Array+Product.swift Added new internal product function to compute the Cartesian product of two sequences.
Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/EffectTests.swift, .../IndependentEffectsTests.swift, .../ProbingOptionsTests.swift Removed Algorithms import statements from test suites.
Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/NestedEffectsTests.swift Removed Algorithms import; updated test attribute to use internal product helper directly.

Poem

The garden’s grown, a weed pulled out—
No more Algorithms hopping about!
A product helper now takes the stage,
Swift and nimble, it sets the gauge.
The code is lighter, tests still run,
Dependency pruning—spring cleaning done!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/NestedEffectsTests.swift (1)

96-96: Updated to use custom product implementation

The function call has been correctly updated to use the new internal product function instead of the one from the removed Algorithms package. The change is minimal and maintains the same behavior.

However, there's a static analysis warning about magic numbers:

Consider replacing the magic numbers with named constants for better readability:

-        arguments: product(1 ..< 3, 1 ..< 3),
+        arguments: product(minValue ..< maxValue, minValue ..< maxValue),
         1 ..< 3

With constants defined at the class level:

private let minValue = 1
private let maxValue = 3
🧰 Tools
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)

[Warning] 96-96: Magic numbers should be replaced by named constants

(no_magic_numbers)


[Warning] 96-96: Magic numbers should be replaced by named constants

(no_magic_numbers)

Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Helpers/Array+Product.swift (1)

9-18: Well-implemented Cartesian product replacement

This new helper function efficiently implements the Cartesian product functionality that was previously provided by the Algorithms package. Using flatMap with lazy.map is an excellent approach for keeping the implementation efficient.

Consider adding a brief documentation comment to explain what the function does:

+/**
+ * Returns an array containing ordered pairs of elements, one from each of the sequences.
+ * This is the Cartesian product of the two sequences.
+ */
internal func product<A, B>(
    _ first: some Sequence<A>,
    _ second: some Sequence<B>
) -> [(A, B)] {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b41faef and 0315fa9.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • Package.resolved (2 hunks)
  • Package.swift (0 hunks)
  • Sources/Probing/Errors/ProbingErrors.swift (1 hunks)
  • Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Helpers/Array+Product.swift (1 hunks)
  • Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/EffectTests.swift (0 hunks)
  • Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/IndependentEffectsTests.swift (0 hunks)
  • Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/NestedEffectsTests.swift (1 hunks)
  • Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/ProbingOptionsTests.swift (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
  • Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/IndependentEffectsTests.swift
  • Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/EffectTests.swift
  • Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/ProbingOptionsTests.swift
  • Package.swift
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/NestedEffectsTests.swift (1)
Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Helpers/Array+Product.swift (1)
  • product (9-18)
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
Tests/ProbeTestingTests/Suites/NestedEffectsTests.swift

[Warning] 96-96: Magic numbers should be replaced by named constants

(no_magic_numbers)


[Warning] 96-96: Magic numbers should be replaced by named constants

(no_magic_numbers)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: build-and-test (watchos)
  • GitHub Check: build-and-test (macos)
  • GitHub Check: build-and-test (tvos)
  • GitHub Check: build-and-test (ios)
  • GitHub Check: build-and-test (maccatalyst)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Package.resolved (1)

2-2: Dependency management updates properly reflect removed packages

The originHash update and PrincipleMacros version update from 1.0.4 to 1.0.6 are consistent with removing the swift-algorithms and swift-numerics dependencies. This change aligns well with the PR objective.

Also applies to: 18-19

Sources/Probing/Errors/ProbingErrors.swift (1)

218-218: Replaced Algorithms dependency with standard library approach

The code now uses the standard Swift lazy.compactMap(\.self) approach instead of relying on a custom compacted() method from the Algorithms package. This change maintains the same functionality while removing the external dependency.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@NSFatalError NSFatalError merged commit f8b7c28 into main May 16, 2025
9 checks passed
@NSFatalError NSFatalError deleted the feature/remove-algorithms branch May 16, 2025 11:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants