adding winding number for regulators#76
Open
zzink-nrel wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An issue arises in writing OpenDSS voltage regulators where the controlled winding is not specified and OpenDSS defaults to winding=1 which is not the typical expected behavior of controlling the low side.
This was not discovered in tests because the tests disable controlled assets. By inspection, the regulators in IEEE13 would fail to be reproduced.
I have added it this way (hard-coded) because GDM has no field that captures this information. If supported by others, I could add thie to GDM:
and read it in properly: