Skip to content

Conversation

@teskje
Copy link
Contributor

@teskje teskje commented Oct 31, 2025

Motivation

Tips for reviewer

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

@teskje teskje force-pushed the persist-lazy-schema-testing branch from beee32d to f3da090 Compare November 4, 2025 13:05
@teskje teskje force-pushed the persist-lazy-schema-testing branch from f3da090 to ed867df Compare November 4, 2025 13:08
@teskje teskje force-pushed the persist-lazy-schema-testing branch from ed867df to e7f5d46 Compare November 4, 2025 13:10
@teskje teskje closed this Nov 7, 2025
@teskje teskje deleted the persist-lazy-schema-testing branch November 7, 2025 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant