[adulau]

Add Data Maintenance to Using MISP with a private practice exercise and 14 genuine MISP 3.0 UI screenshots, checked against 3.0_wip commit 99ebee729.

• Explain event-scoped bulk selection, Keep current, replacement comments, IDS/correlation/distribution controls and the separate Tag/Galaxy actions.
• Document grouping template selection, relation review, new identities, context that needs checking and the deletion of absorbed originals. Explicitly record the native grouping form's HTTP 400 save rejection on the checked development commit; screenshots stop at the genuine review, and the original attributes remain intact.
• Demonstrate selective event-content merge: exclude a standalone candidate, copy an object and report, verify new UUIDs and preserve the source event. Distinguish this from a combined extension view and explain inherited audience changes.
• Demonstrate a complete attribute soft-delete/restore cycle with the same ID/UUID. Explain permanent deletion, sanitization, whole-object recovery limits and whole-event deletion. Only the new empty disposable event was actually removed; object deletion was cancelled.
• Link the chapter from usage, object maintenance and extended events, with source/screenshot provenance and read-back verification.

Local validation: full HTML/PDF/ePub render; PDF smoke profile; offline links and fragments; generated data-model reference; desktop/mobile layouts in light/dark mode; all 14 lightboxes and screenshot assets in exports; PDF text bounds; existing diagram hashes; git diff --check. Working fixtures remain private, unpublished and IDS-off. Reader preferences and application source were unchanged, and the three task-started services were stopped.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-08T10:47:02.892627Z	d695465	PR opened
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-08T10:47:26.951734Z	d695465	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.