Skip to content

Conversation

@kritiGoyal25
Copy link

@kritiGoyal25 kritiGoyal25 commented Sep 17, 2025

Django-todo-deployment

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Appended brief post–docker-compose guidance noting that code should be deployed after services start.
    • Added an informal line to help new users understand next steps.
    • Documentation-only change; no impact on application behavior, configuration, or runtime.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Walkthrough

Appended two plain-text lines to README.md after the docker-compose commands: "code should be deplyed" and "code chal jaaaaa". No code, configuration, exported/public declarations, or runtime behavior changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
README.md
Appended two new lines after the docker-compose commands: "code should be deplyed" and "code chal jaaaaa". No other edits.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I hopped to the README, left a tiny cheer,
"code should be deplyed" and "code chal jaaaaa" appear.
No builds disturbed, no tests undone,
Just parchment whispers in a doc-made sun.
Thump-thump—another note, the change is fun 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "Update README.md" accurately reflects the primary change in the PR, which is an update to README.md (two lines appended). It is concise and directly related to the changeset, though it does not describe the exact content of the edits.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7584e13 and 96ccef2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)

7-7: Fix typo and make the note clear.

"deplyed" → "deployed"; also make the statement actionable.

-code should be deplyed
+The application should now be deployed.

Optional: follow this with quick checks (e.g., “Verify containers are running: docker compose ps”). Also consider updating earlier commands from “docker-compose” to “docker compose” (Compose v2).


6-6: Tighten formatting around the command block.

The extra blank line is fine, but a small readability win is to replace it with a subheading before the status note.

-
+## Deployment status
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c2dca3f and 7584e13.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant