2026 Smoot Annual Review - #326
weijia31415 wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: weijia31415 <33639127+weijia31415@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Only repository collaborators can create a vote @weijia31415. For organization-owned repositories, the list of collaborators includes outside collaborators, organization members that are direct collaborators, organization members with access through team memberships, organization members with access through default organization permissions, and organization owners. |
|
Primary reviewer: @hendrikebbers |
hendrikebbers
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Adding links to topics like "Wanchain implementation", "Harmonia" and other would be a great benefit
mbrandenburger
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for submitting this report. Overall the report shows some good activity in the smoot project - however, the report could be improved to better highlight the achievements.
When strolling through the smoot project I've noticed that quality of the repositories could be improved. For instance, the repos must follow the LFDT common repository structure, missing or empty READMEs, no code testing via GHA.
Please revisit the incubation entry considerations https://lf-decentralized-trust.github.io/governance/guidelines/project-incubation-entry-considerations/ and make sure you bring the project repositories in a good shape to allow the smooth community grow.
| ## Project Health | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Smoot demonstrated strong development momentum throughout 2025. The following milestones and outcomes were achieved during the year. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be good to give some evidence to make this report stronger. For instance, https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/project/smoot?timeRange=custom&start=2025-01-01&end=2025-12-31 gives an overview about development acticties in the repos.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@weijia31415 did you take a look at the insights here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there an update on this feedback? @weijia31415
|
Thank you @mbrandenburger :) I struggled here since I had the same issues you mentioned but was not aware if it should be blocked or not. Let's discuss in TAC |
Co-authored-by: Marcus Brandenburger <mbrandenburger@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: weijia31415 <33639127+weijia31415@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@weijia31415 Have you made all the changes requested? And addressed all the topics we discussed on the TAC a couple of months ago? |
Signed-off-by: weijia31415 <33639127+weijia31415@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: weijia31415 <33639127+weijia31415@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: weijia31415 <33639127+weijia31415@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: weijia31415 <33639127+weijia31415@users.noreply.github.com>
@EnriqueL8 The changes have been made. |
jwagantall
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we have an update on this report? We need an update by Sep 10 please.
No description provided.