-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Refactors bulk wiki find method for ranlkpage data #671
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
|
Summary of ChangesHello @AshakaE, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request significantly refactors the logic for fetching wiki data for market cap rankings, breaking down a large, complex method into smaller, more focused functions. This greatly improves the code's structure, readability, and maintainability by leveraging TypeORM's QueryBuilder over raw SQL. While the refactoring is a positive step, I've identified several critical and high-severity issues related to correctness and performance that need to be addressed. These include a bug that could lead to runtime errors, an incorrect database schema definition for an upsert operation, and improper type assertions. Addressing these points will ensure the new implementation is not only cleaner but also robust and correct.
closes https://github.com/EveripediaNetwork/issues/issues/4624