Update module github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/sdk/v7 to v7.37.0

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/sdk/v7	v7.36.0 → v7.37.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

pulumi/pulumi-aws (github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/sdk/v7)

v7.37.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

• Upgrade terraform-provider-aws to v6.53.0 by @​corymhall in #​6516
• Update GitHub Actions workflows. by @​pulumi-provider-automation[bot] in #​6523
• Update GitHub Actions workflows. by @​pulumi-provider-automation[bot] in #​6527
• Apply Eon setup from ci-mgmt by @​corymhall in #​6512
• Update GitHub Actions workflows. by @​pulumi-provider-automation[bot] in #​6530
• ci: skip TestAccSQSQueue_managedEncryption upstream test by @​pose in #​6518
• Update GitHub Actions workflows. by @​pulumi-provider-automation[bot] in #​6536
• Upgrade terraform-provider-aws to v6.54.0 by @​eon-pulumi-agent[bot] in #​6534

New Contributors

• @​eon-pulumi-agent[bot] made their first contribution in #​6534

Full Changelog: pulumi/pulumi-aws@v7.36.0...v7.37.0

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/Paris)

• Branch creation
  • At 12:00 AM through 04:59 AM and 10:00 PM through 11:59 PM, Monday through Friday (* 0-4,22-23 * * 1-5)
  • Only on Sunday and Saturday (* * * * 0,6)
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[dd-prapprover-prod-77c48c]

PRApprover will approve and merge this PR, FAQ, #dx-source-code-management

🛠️ PRApproval Status

• ✅ PR is eligible for auto-approval by rule datadog-agent-renovate - 2026-07-22T16:58:42Z
• ⬜ CI tests passed
• ⬜ Approved
• Manual merge required: this rule does not auto-merge.

➡️ Current phase: waiting for CI tests to complete...

[dd-octo-sts]

/merge

[gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351]

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-07-22 17:19:28 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

---

2026-07-22 17:19:35 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals. View in MergeQueue UI.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

---

2026-07-22 19:09:08 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 2h (p90).

---

2026-07-22 19:53:52 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

[dd-octo-sts]

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 1e49b378:

Results for datadog-agent_7.83.0~devel.git.318.6b06824.pipeline.126300977-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 2847f351-2b8d-46f8-93bf-2b778041c091

Baseline: edfad77
Comparison: a0ce598
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory utilization	+0.58	[+0.33, +0.83]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	memory utilization	+0.46	[+0.36, +0.55]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	+0.33	[+0.29, +0.38]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_idle	memory utilization	+0.23	[+0.17, +0.29]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	memory utilization	-0.08	[-0.12, -0.05]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	-0.11	[-0.16, -0.06]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_private_action_runner	memory utilization	-0.34	[-0.46, -0.22]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_logs	% cpu utilization	-2.14	[-3.13, -1.14]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	observed_value	links
✅	quality_gate_idle	intake_connections	10/10	3 ≤ 4	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10	147.88MiB ≤ 154MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	total_bytes_received	10/10	732.72KiB ≤ 819.20KiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	intake_connections	10/10	3 ≤ 4	bounds checks dashboard
❌	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	7/10	497.24MiB > 495MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	total_bytes_received	10/10	1.12MiB ≤ 1.25MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	intake_connections	10/10	4 ≤ 6	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	memory_usage	10/10	185.13MiB ≤ 195MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	total_bytes_received	10/10	264.17MiB ≤ 292MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	cpu_usage	10/10	368.88 ≤ 2000	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	intake_connections	10/10	3 ≤ 6	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory_usage	10/10	407.25MiB ≤ 430MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	total_bytes_received	10/10	0.93GiB ≤ 1.04GiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_private_action_runner	memory_usage	10/10	71.13MiB ≤ 75MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_idle	cpu_usage	10/10	29.04 ≤ 100	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_idle	memory_usage	10/10	304.36MiB ≤ 330MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	cpu_usage	10/10	63.52 ≤ 200	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	memory_usage	10/10	277.87MiB ≤ 310MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	cpu_usage	10/10	23.10 ≤ 100	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	memory_usage	10/10	285.91MiB ≤ 320MiB	bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

• ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
• ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
• ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Replicate Execution Details

We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.

Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.

Experiment	Variant	Replicates	Failure	Logs	Debug Dashboard
experiment_with_failures	baseline	0 (x8) 1 (x6)	Oom killed		Debug Dashboard

The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.

❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)

Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.

Experiment	Variant	Replicates	Failure	Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features	baseline	10	Oom killed	Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features	comparison	10	Oom killed	Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs	comparison	10	Oom killed	Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs	baseline	10	Oom killed	Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs	comparison	10	Oom killed	Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle	baseline	10	Crashed (exit code: 134)	Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	baseline	10	Crashed (exit code: 134)	Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	baseline	10	Crashed (exit code: 134)	Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	comparison	10	Oom killed	Debug Dashboard

CI Pass/Fail Decision

❌ Failed. Some Quality Gates were violated.

• quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 7/10 replicas passed. Failed 3 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_private_action_runner, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.