Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeLagrange
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 4, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #146 will degrade performances by 24.14%

Comparing feat/test-rust-setup-fork (7e314dd) with main (e5597da)

Summary

⚡ 9 improvements
❌ 8 regressions
✅ 284 untouched
🆕 22 new
⏩ 43 skipped1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
Simulation Iterative 161.7 ns 132.5 ns +22.01%
Simulation Iterative[20] 161.7 ns 132.5 ns +22.01%
Simulation Iterative[21] 163.3 ns 134.2 ns +21.74%
🆕 WallTime slice_into_vec_with_bytes N/A 59 ns N/A
🆕 Simulation slice_into_vec_with_bytes N/A 671.9 ns N/A
🆕 Simulation string_copy_with_bytes_counter N/A 798.1 ns N/A
🆕 WallTime string_copy_with_bytes_counter N/A 61 ns N/A
🆕 Simulation vec_copy_with_bytes_counter N/A 887.5 ns N/A
🆕 WallTime vec_copy_with_bytes_counter N/A 59 ns N/A
🆕 WallTime count_chars_in_string N/A 34 ns N/A
🆕 Simulation count_chars_in_string N/A 730.3 ns N/A
🆕 WallTime uppercase_chars_with_counter N/A 350 ns N/A
🆕 Simulation uppercase_chars_with_counter N/A 2.1 µs N/A
🆕 WallTime hash_computation_cycles N/A 48 ns N/A
🆕 Simulation hash_computation_cycles N/A 512.5 ns N/A
🆕 WallTime simulated_processing_cycles N/A 885 ns N/A
🆕 Simulation simulated_processing_cycles N/A 2 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation filter_items_with_counter N/A 4.8 µs N/A
🆕 WallTime filter_items_with_counter N/A 808 ns N/A
🆕 Simulation process_items_with_counter N/A 835.8 ns N/A
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

  1. 43 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants