This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 3, 2025. It is now read-only.
Update control-1.1.rst Completeness score calculation change #55
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I am reading the Completeness Score metric "What percentage of the current enterprise asset inventory contains necessary detailed information?" The calculation stated "M8/M1." I don't think this calculation makes sense as M8 is the months since las update to GV1. Instead, I would like to propose changing it to M6/M1. In this case we would get count of items with all necessary detail over GV1. Please let me know if I misunderstood the documentation.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I am reading the Completeness Score metric "What percentage of the current enterprise asset inventory contains necessary detailed information?" The calculation stated "M8/M1." I don't think this calculation makes sense as M8 is the months since las update to GV1. Instead, I would like to propose changing it to M6/M1. In this case we would get count of items with all necessary detail over GV1. Please let me know if I misunderstood the documentation.