Skip to content

Integrate doctests pipeline into CI#168

Open
rgwohlbold wants to merge 17 commits into
Aurel300:rewrite-2023from
rgwohlbold:ci-doctests
Open

Integrate doctests pipeline into CI#168
rgwohlbold wants to merge 17 commits into
Aurel300:rewrite-2023from
rgwohlbold:ci-doctests

Conversation

@rgwohlbold
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rgwohlbold rgwohlbold commented Apr 28, 2026

TODO

  • change out branch names in .github/workflows/test.yml

@rgwohlbold rgwohlbold marked this pull request as draft April 28, 2026 10:58
Comment thread .github/workflows/test.yml Outdated
push:
branches: [master, rewrite-2023, staging, trying]
# TODO: remove ci-doctests from here
branches: [master, rewrite-2023, staging, trying, ci-doctests]
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't completely understand. Why do we need a ci-doctests branch? I thought we would always run the doctests when we add commits to rewrite-2023? Or is this exactly what your TODO comments mean?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that's what I tried to express in the TODO. I left the ci-doctests branch in there so that if there are any changes to the PR, the job is rerun. Otherwise, we should remove it from the yaml

@rgwohlbold rgwohlbold changed the title Draft: Integrate doctests pipeline into CI Integrate doctests pipeline into CI May 4, 2026
@rgwohlbold rgwohlbold marked this pull request as ready for review May 4, 2026 14:26
@rgwohlbold rgwohlbold requested a review from ThomasMayerl May 4, 2026 14:45
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ThomasMayerl ThomasMayerl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants