-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
SHIP-0042: Trusted certificates #281
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ | ||
| # Trusted Certificates | ||
| ## Release Signoff Checklist | ||
|
|
||
| - [ ] Enhancement is `implementable` | ||
| - [ ] Design details are appropriately documented from clear requirements | ||
| - [ ] Test plan is defined | ||
| - [ ] Graduation criteria for dev preview, tech preview, GA | ||
| - [ ] User-facing documentation is created in [docs](/docs/) | ||
|
|
||
| ## Open Questions [optional] | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## Summary | ||
|
|
||
| This proposal aims to enhance Shipwright by allowing users to add user certificates in the build container's | ||
| OS trust store by extending the Build APIs to let user define a list of Kubernetes Secrets, which will hold the | ||
| certificate data and will be added to the trust store. | ||
| This capability is essential for scenarios requiring access to external resources like self-signed | ||
| certificates for Git/image registries or other necessary build artifacts, independent of BuildStrategy | ||
| definitions, overcoming a current limitation where all volumes must be pre-defined or overridable via the strategy. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Motivation | ||
|
|
||
| Currently, Shipwright Builds face challenges when needing to utilize resources like self-signed | ||
| certificates for interacting with private Git repositories or image registries. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Goals | ||
|
|
||
| - Extend Build resources API to declare a list of Secrets that hold separate certificate data. | ||
| - Ensure these directly defined volumes are mountable and accessible to all primary containers involved | ||
| in executing the build steps throughout the lifecycle of the build's execution Pod. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Non-Goals | ||
|
|
||
| What is out of scope for this proposal? Listing non-goals helps to focus discussion and make | ||
| progress. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Proposal | ||
|
|
||
| ### User Stories | ||
|
|
||
| #### Using self-signed certificates | ||
|
|
||
| As a user, I want to use Git repositories or image registries that are secured with self-signed | ||
| certificates. These certificates need to be accessible by the build process, potentially across | ||
| multiple steps (e.g., source cloning, image push/pull). | ||
|
|
||
| ### Implementation Notes | ||
|
|
||
| The current BuildRun APIs will be extended to support a list of certificates accepted as kubernetes Secret | ||
| resources, that should be loaded in the container's trust store. | ||
|
|
||
| ```yaml | ||
| apiVersion: shipwright.io/v1beta1 # Ensure this is the correct API group | ||
| kind: Build | ||
| metadata: | ||
| # ... | ||
| spec: | ||
| # ... | ||
| certificates: | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I like that we are supporting multiple certificates - this enables more fine grained distribution of trust. I am concerned that the naming "certificates" is too broad. Are we concerned with certificate authorities for TLS verficiation? X.509 certificates for workload identity? Mutual TLS certificates between services? These are all very different things that utilize similar underlying fundamental technologies. |
||
| - name: custom-cert-1 | ||
| secretName: ca-cert-1 | ||
| mountPath: /etc/ssl/cert # This is optional and will default to configuration from system parameter (see below) | ||
| - name: custom-cert-2 | ||
| secretName: ca-cert-2 | ||
|
Comment on lines
+61
to
+65
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We will need to handle multiple types of objects for certificate data:
|
||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| The default path where the certificates will be mounted is defined in the system parameter API of the build strategy. | ||
| https://shipwright.io/docs/build/buildstrategies/#system-parameters | ||
|
|
||
| params.shp-certificate-directory | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What value is the default? Let's be explicit here. |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| If certificate with the same name is defined at multiple levels, the following precedence will apply | ||
| for its definition (e.g., which Secret or ConfigMap to use): | ||
|
|
||
| - BuildRun.spec.certificates (highest precedence) | ||
| - Build.spec.certificates | ||
| - BuildStrategy.spec.certificates (lowest precedence, acts as a default or template) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| - For new, directly mounted volumes, a mountPath must be specified. | ||
| - The name of the certificate must be unique within the list of certificates defined in any of Build, BuildRun, or BuildStatey. | ||
| - Standard Kubernetes validation for the source secret will apply. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ### Test Plan | ||
|
|
||
| ### Release Criteria | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| #### Upgrade Strategy [if necessary] | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ### Risks and Mitigations | ||
|
|
||
| What are the risks of this proposal and how do we mitigate? Think broadly. For example, consider | ||
| both security and how this will impact the larger Shipwright ecosystem. | ||
|
|
||
| How will security be reviewed and by whom? How will UX be reviewed and by whom? | ||
|
|
||
| ## Drawbacks | ||
|
|
||
| TBD | ||
|
|
||
| ## Alternatives | ||
|
|
||
| TBD | ||
|
|
||
| ## Infrastructure Needed [optional] | ||
|
|
||
| Use this section if you need things from the project. Examples include a new subproject, repos | ||
| requested, github details, and/or testing infrastructure. | ||
|
|
||
| Listing these here allows the community to get the process for these resources started right away. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Implementation History | ||
|
|
||
| Major milestones in the life cycle of a proposal should be tracked in `Implementation History`. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please restore the YAML metadata at the top of the template. We use this to track the lifecycle of the proposal.