[Publish] Pro Workflow

[rohitg00]

Publish Skill Request

Skill Details

• ID: rohitg00/pro-workflow/pro-workflow
• Name: Pro Workflow
• Description: Professional Claude Code workflow patterns from community best practices. Covers self-correcting CLAUDE.md, plan mode, parallel sessions with git worktrees, subagent strategies, DevOps wrap-up commands, context discipline, and model selection. Use when setting up optimal Claude Code workflows or seeking productivity improvements.
• Source: rohitg00/pro-workflow
• Tags: typescript, devops

JSON Entry

{
  "id": "rohitg00/pro-workflow/pro-workflow",
  "name": "Pro Workflow",
  "description": "Professional Claude Code workflow patterns from community best practices. Covers self-correcting CLAUDE.md, plan mode, parallel sessions with git worktrees, subagent strategies, DevOps wrap-up commands, context discipline, and model selection. Use when setting up optimal Claude Code workflows or seeking productivity improvements.",
  "source": "rohitg00/pro-workflow",
  "tags": [
    "typescript",
    "devops"
  ]
}

Checklist

• SKILL.md follows the standard format
• Skill is publicly accessible on GitHub
• Description accurately describes the skill
• Tags are appropriate

---

Submitted via skillkit publish

[m13v]

the parallel sessions with git worktrees pattern is something we use heavily. one tip - make sure your CLAUDE.md warns agents not to switch branches, because parallel agents in worktrees will occasionally try to checkout main and conflict with each other. also the self-correcting CLAUDE.md concept is interesting, we version ours in git so we can diff what changed over time.

[m13v]

our CLAUDE.md with the branch protection warning for parallel agents: https://github.com/m13v/fazm/blob/main/CLAUDE.md - includes the 'NEVER switch branches' rule and worktree patterns.

[github-actions]

Skill submission did not pass automated checks.

Quality score 50/100 is below threshold of 75

Details:

• Security scan: pass (Scanner completed with warnings)
• Quality score: 50/100 (Quality evaluation encountered an error; defaulting to 50)

Please address these issues and update your submission. A maintainer will review manually.