Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Not really. It would seem kind of tricky too, i.e., how to avoid adding the prefix to the already-prefixed value?

Probably there would need to be some new type of task that could use a pattern to match a preference's value and would able to replace the value if it matches the pattern; then one could use captures in the replacement. A little like what's possible with a Text Modify Task...

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by peterkir
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants