Skip to content

Conversation

@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor

@sriroopar sriroopar commented Nov 12, 2025

Description

Added info logs to display information on document retrieved, indices, rank, score and the final document that's picked based on the metrics.

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up dependent library
  • Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
  • CI configuration change
  • Konflux configuration change

Related Tickets & Documents

  • Related Issue #
  • Closes #

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • PR has passed all pre-merge test jobs.
  • If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.

Testing

  • Please provide detailed steps to perform tests related to this code change.

  • How were the fix/results from this change verified? Please provide relevant screenshots or results.
    Verified by running RAG test suite and logs were checked.

image

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from bparees and onmete November 12, 2025 21:44
@sriroopar sriroopar force-pushed the byok_log_enhancements branch from 3035f96 to 6775874 Compare November 12, 2025 22:15
@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

5 similar comments
@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sriroopar sriroopar force-pushed the byok_log_enhancements branch from e9c6284 to b559dd8 Compare November 18, 2025 16:58
@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest


available_tokens = min(tokens_count, max_tokens)
logger.debug("Available tokens: %d.", tokens_count)
logger.debug("Available tokens: %d.", available_tokens)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I supose this should show the total number of available tokens in the context window, but it is not showing that:

2025-11-19 08:03:01,970 [ols.utils.token_handler:token_handler.py:152] DEBUG: RAG content tokens count: 345.
2025-11-19 08:03:01,970 [ols.utils.token_handler:token_handler.py:155] DEBUG: Available tokens: 345.
2025-11-19 08:03:01,970 [ols.utils.token_handler:token_handler.py:169] INFO: Document #2 selected: title='Preparing your cluster for OpenShift Virtualization', url='https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.17/virt/install/preparing-cluster-for-virt.html', index='default', score=0.5925, tokens=345
2025-11-19 08:03:01,971 [ols.utils.token_handler:token_handler.py:152] DEBUG: RAG content tokens count: 358.
2025-11-19 08:03:01,971 [ols.utils.token_handler:token_handler.py:155] DEBUG: Available tokens: 358.
2025-11-19 08:03:01,971 [ols.utils.token_handler:token_handler.py:169] INFO: Document #3 selected: title='Installing a cluster on any platform', url='https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.17/installing/installing_platform_agnostic/installing-platform-agnostic.html', index='default', score=0.5889, tokens=358

It is showing the same number twice.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sriroopar
It still shows the wrong number as available tokens

2025-11-24 08:30:07,444 [ols.utils.token_handler:token_handler.py:124] INFO: Processing 5 retrieved nodes for RAG context
2025-11-24 08:30:07,444 [ols.utils.token_handler:token_handler.py:152] DEBUG: RAG content tokens count: 103.
2025-11-24 08:30:07,444 [ols.utils.token_handler:token_handler.py:155] DEBUG: Available tokens: 103.

Also, please remove the . after the digit.

"""Initialize custom query fusion class."""
# Extract custom parameters before passing to parent
retriever_weights = kwargs.pop("retriever_weights", None)
index_configs = kwargs.pop("index_configs", None)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why pop instead of get? Do you need to modify input kwargs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assumed that there params will be considered into the parent class, but after checking that's not the case. Updating it to be .get()

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the pop is required here, so that these custom params are not plugged into the parent class. It's also causing e2e and eval to fail, fixing it now!

@sriroopar sriroopar force-pushed the byok_log_enhancements branch 4 times, most recently from 91f3def to 350685c Compare November 21, 2025 17:06
@sriroopar sriroopar requested a review from onmete November 23, 2025 01:12
@sriroopar sriroopar force-pushed the byok_log_enhancements branch 2 times, most recently from 4480685 to 36d0d5c Compare November 25, 2025 04:13
@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

5 similar comments
@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sriroopar sriroopar force-pushed the byok_log_enhancements branch from 36d0d5c to 896db46 Compare December 1, 2025 13:56
@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@sriroopar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

 #Reverting the storing changes
@sriroopar sriroopar force-pushed the byok_log_enhancements branch from 896db46 to ba67786 Compare December 3, 2025 17:05
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2025

@sriroopar: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@onmete
Copy link
Contributor

onmete commented Dec 4, 2025

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: onmete

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit c3f7083 into openshift:main Dec 4, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants