Skip to content

Proposal: Add semaphore implementation based on musl #13

@Igor-Stovba

Description

@Igor-Stovba

Hello, I'd like to propose adding a semaphore implementation to LITL’s synchronization primitives, using musl’s semaphore as the basis.

Before moving forward with a pull request, I wanted to check with you first:
Would you be open to this kind of addition? Do you have any thoughts or preferences on how this should be integrated?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions