Skip to content

file *.switch.bed #167

Description

@cip25

Hi, I’m reviewing .switch.bed files from haplotype phasing and want to confirm my understanding:

Short: small haplotype switches, likely less reliable.

Long: large consistent haplotype blocks, generally more reliable.

Switchback: regions where the haplotype “switches back,” important to check in triobinning.

When deciding whether to replace or validate a fragment flagged as erroneous or less reliable, should I focus mainly on switchback and long regions, while treating short regions as lower priority?

Any confirmation or reference to documentation/papers would be appreciated.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions