Skip to content

Commit 767ea07

Browse files
committed
update site for 2025
1 parent a3810cc commit 767ea07

17 files changed

Lines changed: 10272 additions & 21 deletions

index.html

Lines changed: 13 additions & 12 deletions
Large diffs are not rendered by default.

resources.html

Lines changed: 5 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -20,8 +20,9 @@
2020

2121
<style type="text/css">code{white-space: pre;}</style>
2222
<style type="text/css" data-origin="pandoc">
23+
html { -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%; }
2324
pre > code.sourceCode { white-space: pre; position: relative; }
24-
pre > code.sourceCode > span { line-height: 1.25; }
25+
pre > code.sourceCode > span { display: inline-block; line-height: 1.25; }
2526
pre > code.sourceCode > span:empty { height: 1.2em; }
2627
.sourceCode { overflow: visible; }
2728
code.sourceCode > span { color: inherit; text-decoration: inherit; }
@@ -457,8 +458,8 @@
457458
</style>
458459

459460
<script src="site_libs/jquery-3.6.0/jquery-3.6.0.min.js"></script>
460-
<link href="site_libs/font-awesome-6.4.2/css/all.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
461-
<link href="site_libs/font-awesome-6.4.2/css/v4-shims.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
461+
<link href="site_libs/font-awesome-6.5.2/css/all.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
462+
<link href="site_libs/font-awesome-6.5.2/css/v4-shims.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
462463
<script src="site_libs/headroom-0.9.4/headroom.min.js"></script>
463464
<script src="site_libs/autocomplete-0.37.1/autocomplete.min.js"></script>
464465
<script src="site_libs/fuse-6.4.1/fuse.min.js"></script>
@@ -2098,7 +2099,7 @@ <h3>${suggestion.title}</h3>
20982099
</script>
20992100

21002101
<!--/radix_placeholder_distill-->
2101-
<script src="site_libs/header-attrs-2.28/header-attrs.js"></script>
2102+
<script src="site_libs/header-attrs-2.30/header-attrs.js"></script>
21022103
<script src="site_libs/popper-2.6.0/popper.min.js"></script>
21032104
<link href="site_libs/tippy-6.2.7/tippy.css" rel="stylesheet" />
21042105
<link href="site_libs/tippy-6.2.7/tippy-light-border.css" rel="stylesheet" />

search.json

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -47,15 +47,15 @@
4747
}
4848
],
4949
"date": "`r format(Sys.Date(), '%m-%d-%Y')`",
50-
"contents": "\n\n \nPre-registration opens each spring and training course is provided each fall. Subscribe to the FRB-CESAB newsletter to stay informed. More information is available on the FRB-CESAB website.\n\n\nThe objective of this five-day training course, co-organized by the\nFRB-CESAB, the\nUMS PatriNat and the Cirad HortSys\nis to train young researchers on the methods and techniques of meta-analyses\nand systematic reviews/maps applied to the field of biodiversity.\nN.B. This training course is in French, but slides are available in English in the tab Courses/.\n\nProgram\n\nMonday\n\n\nIcebreaker & Introduction to the week\n\n\nIntroduction to meta-analyses\n\n\n\nInvolving stakeholders & Formulating questions\n\n\n\nThe Protocol\n\n\n\nBibliographic databases & Search equations\n\n\n\nConstitution of the corpus\n\n\n\nArticle screening: Systematic methods & Eligibility criteria\n\n\n\nFull-text retrieval\n\n\n\nTuesday\n\n\nIntroduction to automated screening techniques\n\n\n\nAI-assisted screening\n\n\n\nReporting\n\n\n\nSystematic maps: Metadata extraction\n\n\n\nQualitative metadata extraction: Machine learning approach\n\n\n\nData visualization\n\n\n\nCritical appraisal: understanding its importance\n\n\n\nWednesday\n\n\nMeta-analyses: quantitative approaches\n\n\n\nQuantitative data extraction: what tools are available?\n\n\n\nRisk of bias and interpretation of meta-analysis results\n\n\n\nGoing beyond global mean effect size\n\n\n\nThursday - Friday\n\n\nSubgroups projects\n\n\nPrerequisites\nPlease follow this tutorial to install your working environment before attending the training course. Note: for this course only R and RStudio Desktop are required.\n\nSee also\nDiscover the other training courses provided by the FRB-CESAB and its partners: https://frbcesab.github.io/content/courses.html\nCitation\nLangridge J, Beillouin D, Bonfanti J, Campagne CS, Casajus N, Gosselin F, Ouédraogo D-Y, Petit C, Sordello R & Veytia D (2024) FRB-CESAB, UMS PatriNat & Cirad HortSys training course: Introduction to meta-analyses and systematic reviews.\n\n\n\n",
51-
"last_modified": "2024-10-07T08:09:02+00:00"
50+
"contents": "\n\n \nPre-registration opens each spring and training course is provided each fall. Subscribe to the FRB-CESAB newsletter to stay informed. More information is available on the FRB-CESAB website.\n\n\nThe objective of this five-day training course, co-organized by the\nFRB-CESAB, the\nUMS PatriNat and the Cirad HortSys\nis to train young researchers on the methods and techniques of meta-analyses\nand systematic reviews/maps applied to the field of biodiversity.\nN.B. This training course is in French, but slides are available in English in the tab Courses/.\n\nProgram\n\nMonday\n\n\nIcebreaker & Introduction to the week\n\n\nIntroduction to meta-analyses\n\n\n\nInvolving stakeholders & Formulating questions\n\n\n\nThe Protocol\n\n\n\nBibliographic databases & Search equations\n\n\n\nConstitution of the corpus\n\n\n\nArticle screening: Systematic methods & Eligibility criteria\n\n\n\nFull-text retrieval\n\n\n\nTuesday\n\n\nIntroduction to automated screening techniques\n\n\n\nAI-assisted screening\n\n\n\nReporting\n\n\n\nSystematic maps: Metadata extraction\n\n\n\nQualitative metadata extraction: Machine learning approach\n\n\n\nData visualization\n\n\n\nCritical appraisal: understanding its importance\n\n\n\nWednesday\n\n\nMeta-analyses: quantitative approaches\n\n\n\nQuantitative data extraction: what tools are available?\n\n\n\nRisk of bias and interpretation of meta-analysis results\n\n\n\nGoing beyond global mean effect size\n\n\n\nThursday - Friday\n\n\nSubgroups projects\n\n\nPrerequisites\nPlease follow this tutorial to install your working environment before attending the training course. Note: for this course only R and RStudio Desktop are required.\n\nSee also\nDiscover the other training courses provided by the FRB-CESAB and its partners: https://frbcesab.github.io/content/courses.html\nCitation\nLangridge J, Beillouin D, Bonfanti J, Campagne CS, Casajus N, Gosselin F, Ouédraogo D-Y, Petit C, Sordello R & Veytia D (2025) FRB-CESAB, UMS PatriNat & Cirad HortSys training course: Introduction to meta-analyses and systematic reviews.\n\n\n\n",
51+
"last_modified": "2025-10-05T16:46:48+02:00"
5252
},
5353
{
5454
"path": "resources.html",
5555
"title": "Resources",
5656
"author": [],
5757
"contents": "\n\nPlanning & Question formulation\nFoo YZ, O’Dea RE, Koricheva J, Nakagawa S & Lagisz M (2021) A practical guide to question formation, systematic searching and study screening for literature reviews in ecology and evolution. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13654.\nHaddaway NR & Westgate MJ (2018) Predicting the time needed for environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Conservation Biology, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13231.\nHaddaway NR, Bethel A, Dicks LV, Koricheva J, Macura B, Petrokofsky G, Pullin AS, Savilaakso S & Stewart GB (2020) Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them. Nature Ecology & Evolution, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01295-x.\nLivoreil B, Glanville J, Haddaway NR, Bayliss H, Bethel A, Flamerie de Lachapelle F, Robalino S, Savilaakso S, Zhou W, Petrokofsky G & Frampton G (2017) Systematic searching for environmental evidence using multiple tools and sources. Environmental Evidence, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-017-0099-6.\nNavarro C, Berrebi B, Livoreil B, Richard G & Soubelet H (2020) Méthodes d’expertise : comment les utiliser ? Expertise et synthèse. Paris, France : FRB, 104p. URL: https://www.fondationbiodiversite.fr/guide-des-methodes-dexpertise/.\n\nDatabases & Search engines\nHaddaway NR, Collins AM, Coughlin D & Kirk S (2015) The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLOS One, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138237.\n\nSystematic mapping\nHaddaway NR, Bernes C, Jonsson B-G & Hedlund K (2016) The Benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management. Ambio, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0773-x.\nJames KL, Randall NP & Haddaway NR (2016) A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6.\n\nCritical analysis & Systematic reviewing\nSordello R, Bertheau Y, Coulon A, Jeusset A, Ouédraogo DY, Vanpeene S, Vargac M, Villemey A, Witté I, Reyjol Y & Touroult J (2019) Les protocoles expérimentaux en écologie : principaux points clefs. UMS PatrNat, CESCO, Irstea. 32p. URL: https://www.patrinat.fr/fr/actualites/publication-dun-rapport-de-lums-sur-les-protocoles-experimentaux-6445.\nCEE Critical Appraisal Tool: https://environmentalevidence.org/cee-critical-appraisal-tool/\n\nMeta-analyses\nBorenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT & Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386.\nKoricheva J, Gurevitch J & Mengersen K (2013) Handbook of meta-analysis in ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press, 592p. URL:\nhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt24hq6n\nNakagawa, S, Yang, Y, Macartney, EL et al. (2023) Quantitative evidence synthesis: A practical guide on meta-analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias tests for environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-023-00301-6.\n\nR Packages\nLajeunesse MJ (2016) Facilitating systematic reviews, data extraction and meta-analysis with the metagear package for R. Methods in Ecology & Evolution, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12472.\nViechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, doi: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03.\nWestgate MJ (2019) revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis. Research Synthesis Methods, doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1374.\nPick JL, Nakagawa S & Noble DWA (2019) Reproducible, flexible and high-throughput data extraction from primary literature: The metaDigitise R package. Methods in Ecology & Evolution, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13118.\nGrames EM, Stillman AN, Tingley MW & Elphick CS (2019) An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co-occurrence networks. Methods in Ecology & Evolution, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13268.\n\nWebsites\nhttps://www.metafor-project.org/doku.php/metafor\nhttps://bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/\n\nA must read\nPullin AS, Cheng SH, Jackson JD, Eales J, Envall I, Fada SJ, Frampton GK, Harper M, Kadykalo AN, Kohl C, Konno K, Livoreil B, Ouédraogo D-Y, O’Leary BC, Pullin G, Randall N, Rees R, Smith A, Sordello R, Sterling EJ, Twardek WM, Woodcock P (2022) Standards of conduct and reporting in evidence syntheses that could inform environmental policy and management decisions. Environmental Evidence, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00269-9.\n\n\n\n",
58-
"last_modified": "2024-10-07T08:09:03+00:00"
58+
"last_modified": "2025-10-05T16:46:48+02:00"
5959
}
6060
],
6161
"collections": []

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)