|
| 1 | +# `LND Database Upgrade Guide`: A Two-Stage Migration for Node Operators |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +*Table of Contents* |
| 4 | +- [Overview](#overview) |
| 5 | +- [Operation Modes](#operation-modes) |
| 6 | +- [Stage 1: Migration from bbolt to SQLite/Postgres (kvdb)](#stage-1-migration-from-bbolt-to-sqlitepostgres-kvdb) |
| 7 | + - [Choosing Your Target Backend](#choosing-your-target-backend) |
| 8 | + - [Postgres kvdb Migration](#postgres-kvdb-migration) |
| 9 | + - [SQLite kvdb Migration](#sqlite-kvdb-migration) |
| 10 | +- [Stage 2: Migration from kvdb to Relational Database](#stage-2-migration-from-kvdb-to-relational-database) |
| 11 | + - [Subsystem Readiness](#subsystem-readiness) |
| 12 | +- [Known Limitations and Edge Cases](#known-limitations-and-edge-cases) |
| 13 | +- [Best Practices for Node Operators](#best-practices-for-node-operators) |
| 14 | + - [Choosing the Right Path](#choosing-the-right-path) |
| 15 | + - [Timing Your Migration](#timing-your-migration) |
| 16 | + - [Validation](#validation) |
| 17 | +- [Implementation Examples](#implementation-examples) |
| 18 | + - [Migrating to SQLite kvdb](#migrating-to-sqlite-kvdb) |
| 19 | + - [Migrating Invoices to Relational Backend](#migrating-invoices-to-relational-backend) |
| 20 | +- [Future Improvements](#future-improvements) |
| 21 | +- [Conclusion](#conclusion) |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +--- |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +## Overview |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +The `LND Database Upgrade` process enables node operators to migrate from the legacy **bbolt** key-value store to modern **SQLite** or **PostgreSQL** backends—first in **kvdb mode**, then ultimately to a **relational database** format. This two-stage migration addresses long-standing performance bottlenecks, and lays the foundation for scalable, maintainable node operations. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +This guide explains the migration path, backend trade-offs, subsystem readiness, and best practices for safely upgrading your LND database. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +--- |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +## Operation Modes |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +The LND database upgrade operates in two sequential stages, each with distinct tooling and implications: |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +```mermaid |
| 38 | +flowchart TD |
| 39 | + %% 1. Define all nodes |
| 40 | + Bbolt["Bbolt (kvdb)"] |
| 41 | + SQLite["SQLite (kvdb)"] |
| 42 | + Postgres["Postgres (kvdb)"] |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | + M1_Sqlite["Migration #1 (lnd v0.19)<br>Invoices"] |
| 45 | + M2_Sqlite["Migration #2 (lnd v0.20)<br>Graph"] |
| 46 | + M3_Sqlite["Migration #3 (lnd v0.21)<br>Payments"] |
| 47 | +
|
| 48 | + M1_Postgres["Migration #1 (lnd v0.19)<br>Invoices"] |
| 49 | + M2_Postgres["Migration #2 (lnd v0.20)<br>Graph"] |
| 50 | + M3_Postgres["Migration #3 (lnd v0.21)<br>Payments"] |
| 51 | +
|
| 52 | + %% 2. Define all links (within and between graphs) |
| 53 | + Bbolt --> SQLite |
| 54 | + Bbolt --> Postgres |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | + SQLite --> M1_Sqlite |
| 57 | + M1_Sqlite --> M2_Sqlite |
| 58 | + M2_Sqlite --> M3_Sqlite |
| 59 | +
|
| 60 | + Postgres --> M1_Postgres |
| 61 | + M1_Postgres --> M2_Postgres |
| 62 | + M2_Postgres --> M3_Postgres |
| 63 | +
|
| 64 | + %% 3. Group nodes into subgraphs |
| 65 | + subgraph "Step 1: Migration via lndinit" |
| 66 | + Bbolt |
| 67 | + SQLite |
| 68 | + Postgres |
| 69 | + end |
| 70 | +
|
| 71 | + subgraph "Step 2: Migration within lnd" |
| 72 | + M1_Sqlite |
| 73 | + M2_Sqlite |
| 74 | + M3_Sqlite |
| 75 | + M1_Postgres |
| 76 | + M2_Postgres |
| 77 | + M3_Postgres |
| 78 | + end |
| 79 | +
|
| 80 | + %% 4. Apply Styles |
| 81 | + %% Define classes with explicit dark text color (#333) |
| 82 | + classDef bboltNode fill:#e2e3e5,stroke:#383d41,color:#333 |
| 83 | + classDef sqliteNode fill:#d4edda,stroke:#155724,color:#333 |
| 84 | + classDef postgresNode fill:#cce5ff,stroke:#004085,color:#333 |
| 85 | +
|
| 86 | + %% Apply classes to nodes |
| 87 | + class Bbolt bboltNode |
| 88 | + class SQLite,M1_Sqlite,M2_Sqlite,M3_Sqlite sqliteNode |
| 89 | + class Postgres,M1_Postgres,M2_Postgres,M3_Postgres postgresNode |
| 90 | +``` |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +- **Stage 1**: Migrate from bbolt to a SQL-based **kvdb** backend using the [lndinit](https://github.com/lightninglabs/lndinit/blob/main/docs/data-migration.md) tool. |
| 93 | +- **Stage 2**: Incrementally migrate subsystem data (invoices, graph, payments, etc.) from **kvdb** to SQL native **relational tables** as support becomes available. |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +--- |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +## Stage 1: Migration from bbolt to SQLite/Postgres (kvdb) |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +LND cannot run with mixed backends, so all users must first leave bbolt behind. This stage uses the `lndinit` utility to perform an offline migration. |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +### Choosing Your Target Backend |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +| Backend | Performance (in kvdb mode) | Default in LND? | Long-Term Viability | |
| 104 | +|-----------|--------------------------|------------------|----------------------| |
| 105 | +| Postgres | Mediocre | No | ✅ | |
| 106 | +| SQLite | Good | **Yes (future)** | ✅ | |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +> 💡 **Recommendation**: Unless you require Postgres for infrastructure reasons, |
| 109 | + **migrate to SQLite kvdb** as your backend. |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +### Postgres kvdb Migration |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +A migration script is available via `lndinit`: |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +- [Postgres migration script](https://github.com/lightninglabs/lndinit/blob/main/docs/data-migration.md#using-postgres-as-the-destination-remote-database) |
| 116 | +- **Caveat**: Users report degraded performance in kvdb mode. Only proceed if you plan to **immediately follow with Stage 2** to migrate the available data stores to relational DB. |
| 117 | +This will mitigate the poor Postgres performance on kvdb. |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +### SQLite kvdb Migration |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +- [SQLite migration script](https://github.com/lightninglabs/lndinit/blob/main/docs/data-migration.md#using-sqlite-as-the-destination-remote-database) |
| 122 | +- **Advantage**: Maintains good performance while waiting for full relational migration. |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +--- |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +## Stage 2: Migration from kvdb to Relational Database |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +This stage unlocks true SQL performance by restructuring data into relational tables. Migration is **per-subsystem** and **incremental**. |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +### Subsystem Readiness |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +| Subsystem | Relational Backend | Migration Script | Status | |
| 133 | +|---------------------|--------------------|------------------|--------| |
| 134 | +| Invoices | ✅ Available | ✅ | Available with **v0.19** | |
| 135 | +| Graph | ✅ Available | ✅ | Available with **v0.20** | |
| 136 | +| Payments | 🚧 In Progress | Planned | Targeted with **v0.21**| |
| 137 | +| Btcwallet | 🚧 In Progress | Planned | Targeted with **v0.21**| |
| 138 | +| Forwarding History | ❌ TBD | ❌ TBD | Future work | |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +--- |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +## Known Limitations and Edge Cases |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +- **Single database engine required**: LND requires a single consistent backend. |
| 145 | +You cannot run invoices in relational mode while graph remain in kvdb *unless* |
| 146 | +both are on the same SQL engine (e.g., SQLite). |
| 147 | +- **Data loss risk**: Always **back up your `data/` directory** before migration. |
| 148 | +- **Downtime required**: Stage 1 requires LND to be offline. Stage 2 is done at startup, requiring a LND restart. |
| 149 | +- **Postgres kvdb performance**: Postgres performance on kvdb is sub-optimal. It is |
| 150 | +recommended to make the stage 2 migration immediately to avoid performance bottlenecks. Certain RPCs like `listpayments` may not perform well on Postgres if the node has a lot of payments data. If your node operation is heavy |
| 151 | +on payments and `listpayments` performance is critical for you, we'd recommend |
| 152 | +not doing any migration and wait till version 0.21.0 is released. |
| 153 | +- **No migration path between SQL backend**: Once migrated to either Postgres or |
| 154 | +SQLite, it is not possible to switch to the other, so choose your target backend carefully. |
| 155 | +--- |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +## Best Practices for Node Operators |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | +### Choosing the Right Path |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +- **For most users**: Choose SQLite, then migrate. Later, adopt relational backends subsystem-by-subsystem. |
| 162 | +- **Enterprise/Postgres users**: It is recommened to wait to start the migration |
| 163 | +until **payments relational backend** is ready, then perform **Stage 1 + Stage 2 in quick succession**. |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +### Timing Your Migration |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +- Perform migrations during **low-activity periods**. |
| 168 | +- Monitor LND release notes for relational DB support of different subsystems. |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +### Validation |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +1. Stop LND. |
| 173 | +2. Run migration with `lndinit`. |
| 174 | +3. Start LND with new backend flags, to execute stage 2 migrations. |
| 175 | +4. Validate node health: channels, balance, invoice/payment history. |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +--- |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +## Implementation Examples |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +### Migrating to SQLite kvdb |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +```bash |
| 184 | +# Stop LND |
| 185 | +lnd --shutdown |
| 186 | + |
| 187 | +# Backup |
| 188 | +cp -r ~/.lnd ~/lnd-backup-$(date +%Y%m%d) |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +# Run migration (e.g. sqlite) |
| 191 | +lndinit --debuglevel info migrate-db \ |
| 192 | +--source.bolt.data-dir ~/.lnd/data \ |
| 193 | +--dest.backend sqlite \ |
| 194 | +--dest.sqlite.data-dir ~/.lnd/data --network mainnet |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | +# Start LND with SQLite backend |
| 197 | +lnd --db.backend=sqlite |
| 198 | +``` |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | +> 📝 Add `db.backend=sqlite` to your `lnd.conf` to make it persistent. |
| 201 | +
|
| 202 | +### Migrating Invoices to Relational Backend |
| 203 | + |
| 204 | +Once on LND v0.19+ with SQLite/Postgres: |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | +```bash |
| 207 | +# Ensure backend is set |
| 208 | +echo "db.backend=sqlite" >> ~/.lnd/lnd.conf |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | +# Start LND — invoice migration runs automatically |
| 211 | +lnd |
| 212 | +``` |
| 213 | + |
| 214 | +Check logs for: |
| 215 | +``` |
| 216 | +Migrating invoices from kvdb to relational format... |
| 217 | +Invoice migration completed successfully. |
| 218 | +``` |
| 219 | + |
| 220 | +--- |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | +## Future Improvements |
| 223 | + |
| 224 | +The LND team is actively working on: |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +- **Payments relational backend** and migration tooling (Stage 2) |
| 227 | +- **Btcwallet relational backend** and migration tooling (Stage 2) |
| 228 | +- **Forwarding history** relational schema (long-term) |
| 229 | +- **Automatic detection** of migration readiness in `lnd` |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | +Node operators should monitor: |
| 232 | +- [LND GitHub Releases](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/releases) |
| 233 | +- [lndinit repository](https://github.com/lightninglabs/lndinit) |
| 234 | + |
| 235 | +--- |
| 236 | + |
| 237 | +## Conclusion |
| 238 | + |
| 239 | +The LND database upgrade is a strategic two-stage process designed to eliminate bbolt performance limitations while ensuring data integrity and operational continuity. |
| 240 | + |
| 241 | +By **first migrating to SQLite/Postgres kvdb** and **then adopting relational backends incrementally**, node operators can achieve significant performance gains—especially for payment-heavy workloads—without rushing into unstable configurations. |
| 242 | + |
| 243 | +Choose your path wisely, back up rigorously, and stay informed. The future of LND is relational, and this guide ensures you get there safely. |
0 commit comments