flat-earth correction in generate_ifgram.py #141
Replies: 1 comment
|
UPDATE Could you clarify how the sample GAMMA RSLCs were generated? When I create a raw interferogram using gamma's interf_SLC, the sample dataset already produces an almost flattened-looking interferogram, whereas RSLCs produced by my standard GAMMA workflow retain the expected flat-earth phase. Since MiaplPy simply phase-links the input SLCs and forms interferograms by conjugate multiplication, I'm trying to understand what preprocessing was applied to the sample RSLCs that makes them suitable for this workflow. I checked that slcStack.h5 is an exact copy of the input SLC, so the difference is not introduced by prep_slc_gamma.py or load_data.py. Can someone tell me what gamma command was used to create the SLCs? I have release 2020. Thank you in advane! |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi All,
I'm running MiaplPy with a GAMMA-generated SLC stack and I'm trying to understand where the flat-earth (and topographic) phase is removed when interferograms are generated from the phase-linked stack.
Looking at
generate_ifgram.py, the interferogram appears to be formed simply as the phase difference between the reference and secondary phase-linked SLCs:I cannot find any step that applies a geometric flattening term (or a simulated topographic phase) before writing
filt_fine.int.My understanding from the ISCE discussions (#513 and #931) is that standard ISCE interferograms are flattened during interferogram formation using the orbit/geometry information, rather than storing flattened SLCs.
Therefore I would like to clarify:
phase_series.h5already contain phase-linked SLCs with the flat-earth phase removed?generate_ifgram.pyintentionally producing an unflattened interferogram?The reason I'm asking is that the interferograms generated by MiaplPy contain a strong deterministic range fringe pattern, whereas the corresponding GAMMA differential interferograms are already flattened. I'm trying to understand whether this difference is expected or whether I'm missing a processing step.
Any clarification would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!

The miapl ifgram and the one created by gamma
view.py inverted/interferograms_single_reference/20230317_20230329/filt_fine.int --wrap --wrap-range -3.1416 3.1416 --nodisplay
20230317_20230329.diff.bmp
All reactions