Skip to content

Conversation

@suneepathangay
Copy link

@suneepathangay suneepathangay commented Sep 7, 2025

fix:When running the nanoLVM model out of the box, encountered an issue where there was an extra config. Decided the easiest way was just to remove that config until the config.json is updated in hugging face.

@andimarafioti
Copy link
Member

Hi, wouldn't it be better to update the way the model is pushed to the hub? Or are the models that are now pushed consistent with the current code?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants