[cache-strategy] Cache Strategy Analysis - 2026-08-07

[github-actions[bot]]

Cache Strategy Analysis Report

Date: 2026-08-07
Runs Analyzed: 10
Workflows with cache-memory: 1

---

Executive Summary

The last 24 hours of pre-downloaded agentic workflow runs contained one workflow that explicitly declares cache-memory: Linter Miner (§31203064839). Its cache configuration appears structurally sound: the workflow uses a stable key (linter-miner-state-${{ github.workflow }}), restores cache-memory before agent execution, and saves cache-memory again at the end of the run.

No actionable cache problems met the issue threshold today. There was no explicit cache-miss signal in the available evidence, but the downloaded bundle did not include raw agent/activation log lines that would let this analyzer prove a positive cache hit, so this run is recorded as a baseline observation rather than a confirmed hit.

---

Findings

Severity	Workflow	Miss Streak	Miss Rate (14d)	Root Cause	Issue
n/a	Linter Miner	0 days	n/a	Stable key; restore/save path observed; no explicit miss signal	n/a

🔴 Critical Issues

None.

🟠 High Priority

None.

🟡 Medium Priority

None.

---

Healthy Workflows

No workflow qualified yet for the “consistent cache hits” bucket because today’s evidence set was missing raw log lines needed to confirm an actual read from prior cache contents.

---

Issues Created Today

No new issues created — no cache-memory workflow crossed the miss-streak, miss-rate, or misconfiguration thresholds.

---

💾 Cache Memory Summary

• Total workflows tracked: 1
• Runs recorded (last 30d): 1
• Cache memory location: /tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/cache-strategy/
• Next pruning date: 2026-09-06
• Historical state: initialized on this run because cache-strategy/ was absent at startup
• Evidence gap: run summaries showed restore/save steps, but the downloaded log bundle lacked raw agent/activation text for direct hit confirmation

Next Actions

1. Keep tracking Linter Miner across the next few daily runs to establish whether the cache is producing explicit hits or repeated cold starts.
2. If future log bundles continue omitting raw cache evidence, extend the workflow’s logging around preload and cache writeback so hit/miss state is directly observable.
3. Revisit issue creation once at least 3 explicit cache observations exist for the same workflow.

References:

• §31207546910
• §31203064839

Generated by 📊 Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer · gpt54 · 54.4 AIC · ⊞ 12.6K · ◷

• expires on Aug 8, 2026, 10:42 AM UTC-08:00