Agent Performance Report - Week of 2026-08-06

[github-actions[bot]]

Warning

Threat Detection Engine Failure — The analysis engine could not complete. This is a tooling failure, not a security finding.

What happened

The threat detection engine failed to produce results.

Review the workflow run logs for details.

Agent Performance Report — 2026-08-06

Executive Summary

• Agents analyzed: 45 (from metrics/latest.json, partial 24h window)
• Bottom-10 audit requested for 3 named candidates: Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer, Impeccable Skills Reviewer, Design Decision Gate
• Key correction: stale memory (agent-performance-latest.md, dated Jul 8) records these as 100% AR / CLI-hang failures. Current metrics/latest.json (timestamp 2026-08-06T03:44:10Z) shows both skills reviewers now fully healthy:
  • Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer: 19/19 success (100%), 239,690 tokens, 164 action-min
  • Impeccable Skills Reviewer: 20/20 success (100%), 157,010 tokens, 158 action-min
  • Design Decision Gate: no runs recorded in today's 200-run sample window — cannot score; likely dormant due to narrow trigger scope (labeled+implementation label AND path filter), not a failure.

Bottom-10 Prompt Deficiency Audit (requested candidates)

Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer — no deficiency found; flag redundancy instead

• Prompt already has explicit success criteria, a noop-on-nothing-to-say rule, progressive disclosure, and a haiku triage sub-agent (pr-triage) that classifies change type before skill selection — this is a self-assessment loop, not missing.
• No stale examples detected; skill list matches installed skills.
• Not a prompt-quality problem. Runtime metrics are currently green (100% success today).

Impeccable Skills Reviewer — no deficiency found; flag overlap

• Same shape as Matt Pocock: success criteria present, noop guidance present, scope rules present (changed-lines-only, security>correctness>reliability>maintainability).
• Overlap concern: Impeccable and Matt Pocock both trigger on pull_request: ready_for_review (minus doc paths), both do skill-based inline PR review with up to 10 comments + 1 overall review + 1 optional summary comment. This is coverage redundancy, not a quality defect — two nearly-identical review passes run on the same PRs.

Design Decision Gate — cannot audit quality; flag inactivity

• Zero runs in the current metrics window. Trigger requires labeled/ready_for_review and an implementation label and a path match against actions/**, cmd/**, internal/**, pkg/**, etc.
• Recommend Workflow Health Manager confirm whether the implementation label is actually being applied to qualifying PRs — if not, this agent is effectively silent regardless of prompt quality.

Recommendation

1. Consolidate/differentiate Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer and Impeccable Skills Reviewer. Both currently run full independent reviews on the same PR events with materially the same scope rules and output shape, just different skill sources. Either merge into one workflow selecting skill source per PR, or clearly separate their responsibilities (e.g., one focuses on architecture/TDD, the other on a distinct skill set) to reduce duplicate reviewer noise on every PR.
2. Verify Design Decision Gate's implementation label usage before concluding it's underperforming — it may simply never be triggered.
3. Update agent-performance-latest.md — the Jul 8 "100% AR / CLI hang" entries for these three agents are stale and should not be repeated in future reports without re-verification against current metrics/latest.json.

Next Steps

• File consolidation issue for the two skills reviewers (below).
• No action needed for Design Decision Gate until label-usage is confirmed by Workflow Health Manager.

---

Analysis window: 2026-08-05 to 2026-08-06 (partial, 200 most recent runs)

Generated by ⚡ Agent Performance Analyzer - Meta-Orchestrator · auto · 36 AIC · ⊞ 16.9K · ◷

• expires on Aug 7, 2026, 5:18 AM UTC-08:00

[github-actions[bot]]

This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-08-07T13:18:33.422Z.

Closed by Workflow