Merge #7013: fix: update BuildTestVectors call to adjust batch size based on output flag

b220dec fix: update BuildTestVectors call to adjust batch size based on output flag (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  see #7011

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  runs locally; but I didn't reproduce the failure, likely due to different compilation flags. Even with undefined sanitizer, I couldn't reproduce.

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK b220dec

Tree-SHA512: 5cfb630c576abf7f019348fd4acd878ab44485bd0b658521660259ed1ea0570b46eafbbd783bc58f2b707d549f6daf74e1c8f16a636b597d1c3e9aab386f5722

Author: PastaPastaPasta

src/bench/bls.cpp

@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static void BLS_Verify_Batched(benchmark::Bench& bench)
     std::vector<CBLSSignature> sigs;
     std::vector<uint256> msgHashes;
     std::vector<bool> invalid;
-    BuildTestVectors(bench.output() ? 1000 : 1, 10, pubKeys, secKeys, sigs, msgHashes, invalid);
+    BuildTestVectors(bench.output() ? 1000 : 1, bench.output() ? 10 : 1, pubKeys, secKeys, sigs, msgHashes, invalid);
 
     // Benchmark.
     size_t i = 0;
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static void BLS_Verify_BatchedParallel(benchmark::Bench& bench)
     std::vector<CBLSSignature> sigs;
     std::vector<uint256> msgHashes;
     std::vector<bool> invalid;
-    BuildTestVectors(bench.output() ? 1000 : 1, 10, pubKeys, secKeys, sigs, msgHashes, invalid);
+    BuildTestVectors(bench.output() ? 1000 : 1, bench.output() ? 10 : 1, pubKeys, secKeys, sigs, msgHashes, invalid);
 
     std::list<std::pair<size_t, std::future<bool>>> futures;