I'm not reporting an issue so I hope it's ok if I skip the questions.
I'm interested in submitting a pull request that adds support for gomobile.
The commit message explains how it works:
0f03de8
However, it is not fully finished as it requires that no exported symbols are garbled. gobind generates bindings for exported symbols, so if those symbols are renamed, the bindings would not work. So the solution would be to not garble any exported symbols if the command is "garble mobile".
My questions are these:
A.) Are you open to a pull request like this?
B.) Do you think this is a good implementation?
C.) Do you see any pitfalls with this implementation?
D.) Are there any changes you would recommend?
E.) Are there any tests you would recommend writing?
F.) What would be the best way to add support for not garbling exported symbols if the command being run is "garble mobile"?
I'm not reporting an issue so I hope it's ok if I skip the questions.
I'm interested in submitting a pull request that adds support for gomobile.
The commit message explains how it works:
0f03de8
However, it is not fully finished as it requires that no exported symbols are garbled. gobind generates bindings for exported symbols, so if those symbols are renamed, the bindings would not work. So the solution would be to not garble any exported symbols if the command is "garble mobile".
My questions are these:
A.) Are you open to a pull request like this?
B.) Do you think this is a good implementation?
C.) Do you see any pitfalls with this implementation?
D.) Are there any changes you would recommend?
E.) Are there any tests you would recommend writing?
F.) What would be the best way to add support for not garbling exported symbols if the command being run is "garble mobile"?