You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it might be benefitial to add any option to the HandleType.
It would be useful mainly with ConnectionMode.Strict, where we would want to keep the strict flow for certain handles.
Worth noting that it still would be resolveable to source -> target relationship for the edges, just allowing developers to create sub-flows where they don't care for the direction.
For example in a geneaology tree, where we care for the parent->child flow, but not so much for the spouse-spouse relationship.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey!
I think it might be benefitial to add
anyoption to the HandleType.It would be useful mainly with
ConnectionMode.Strict, where we would want to keep the strict flow for certain handles.Worth noting that it still would be resolveable to
source -> targetrelationship for the edges, just allowing developers to create sub-flows where they don't care for the direction.For example in a geneaology tree, where we care for the parent->child flow, but not so much for the spouse-spouse relationship.
What do you think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions