Skip to content

should we calculate F1-score with micro-average or macro-average?  #26

Description

@Junpliu

In the jupyter notebook "conll2003 BERTBiLSTMCRF" in the "examples" folder, the result report is as follow:

image

I notice you put macro-avg "0.9221" in the "README.md" file, but it seems like that the code at "https://paperswithcode.com/sota/named-entity-recognition-ner-on-conll-2003" adopt the micro-avg value as the final F1-value.

I would appreciate it very much if you can tell me why, thanks.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions