Skip to content

Commit f78c754

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #261 from activebridge/article_auditready_backend_for_esg
article audit-ready backend for ESG
2 parents 044c59a + 0cdafbb commit f78c754

File tree

3 files changed

+520
-0
lines changed

3 files changed

+520
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 137 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
1+
[
2+
{
3+
"@context": "https://schema.org",
4+
"@type": "BlogPosting",
5+
"mainEntityOfPage": {
6+
"@type": "WebPage",
7+
"@id": "https://www.activebridge.org/blog/audit-ready-backend-esg-compliance-csrd-xbrl"
8+
},
9+
"headline": "ESG Reporting Software: Build an Audit-Ready Backend",
10+
"description": "ESG reporting software needs an audit-ready backend: traceability, RBAC/RLS, versioned rules, data tests, and CSRD Inline XBRL tagging—so evidence is ready on demand.",
11+
"image": {
12+
"@type": "ImageObject",
13+
"url": "https://www.activebridge.org/assets/blog/audit-ready-esg-backend-cover.webp",
14+
"width": 1200,
15+
"height": 630
16+
},
17+
"author": {
18+
"@type": "Organization",
19+
"name": "Active Bridge",
20+
"url": "https://www.activebridge.org"
21+
},
22+
"publisher": {
23+
"@type": "Organization",
24+
"name": "Active Bridge",
25+
"logo": {
26+
"@type": "ImageObject",
27+
"url": "https://www.activebridge.org/assets/logo.png",
28+
"width": 512,
29+
"height": 512
30+
}
31+
},
32+
"datePublished": "2025-10-17",
33+
"dateModified": "2025-10-17",
34+
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
35+
"keywords": [
36+
"audit-ready backend",
37+
"ESG reporting software",
38+
"CSRD reporting software",
39+
"XBRL tagging for CSRD",
40+
"ESG data lineage",
41+
"audit trail",
42+
"RBAC",
43+
"Postgres RLS",
44+
"dbt",
45+
"Great Expectations",
46+
"Scope 3 data pipeline",
47+
"ESG data integration",
48+
"ESRS taxonomy",
49+
"ESEF validation",
50+
"OpenTelemetry",
51+
"SOC 2",
52+
"ISO 27001",
53+
"assurance readiness",
54+
"evidence bundle"
55+
],
56+
"articleSection": [
57+
"Introduction",
58+
"What an Audit-Ready Backend Really Requires",
59+
"Why Most MVPs Miss Audit Readiness",
60+
"How to Build an Audit-Ready Backend in Rails",
61+
"Reporting & Tagging for Assurance (CSRD, XBRL, ESEF)",
62+
"Integrations That Matter for ESG (ERP, Utilities, IoT)",
63+
"Business Outcomes and ROI",
64+
"Conclusion: Build Proof into the Backend",
65+
"FAQs"
66+
],
67+
"about": [
68+
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)" },
69+
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "Inline XBRL (iXBRL)" },
70+
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "ESRS Taxonomy" },
71+
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)" },
72+
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "Row-Level Security (RLS)" },
73+
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "SOC 2" },
74+
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "ISO/IEC 27001" }
75+
],
76+
"mentions": [
77+
{ "@type": "CreativeWork", "name": "DORA Metrics" },
78+
{ "@type": "CreativeWork", "name": "NIST SP 800-53 AU" }
79+
],
80+
"wordCount": 3200,
81+
"timeRequired": "PT16M"
82+
},
83+
{
84+
"@context": "https://schema.org",
85+
"@type": "FAQPage",
86+
"mainEntity": [
87+
{
88+
"@type": "Question",
89+
"name": "What is an audit-ready backend for ESG compliance?",
90+
"acceptedAnswer": {
91+
"@type": "Answer",
92+
"text": "An architecture where evidence is routine: traceability with stable IDs and run IDs, RBAC with segregation of duties (often enforced with Postgres RLS), versioned rules and immutable audit logs, data-quality checks (dbt/Great Expectations), CI/CD evidence, and CSRD iXBRL validation with per-period evidence bundles."
93+
}
94+
},
95+
{
96+
"@type": "Question",
97+
"name": "How are audit trails implemented in Rails for CSRD reporting?",
98+
"acceptedAnswer": {
99+
"@type": "Answer",
100+
"text": "Combine model history (e.g., PaperTrail) with an append-only audit log of system events stamped with run IDs and calculation parameters; hash-chain rows for tamper-evidence and link disclosure records to audit events and the ESRS taxonomy version used."
101+
}
102+
},
103+
{
104+
"@type": "Question",
105+
"name": "What’s the difference between data lineage and audit logging?",
106+
"acceptedAnswer": {
107+
"@type": "Answer",
108+
"text": "Lineage explains how a figure was produced (inputs → transforms → outputs). The audit log records who did what, when, and why. Both are required for assurance."
109+
}
110+
},
111+
{
112+
"@type": "Question",
113+
"name": "How should Scope 3 pipelines handle supplier data and emission factors?",
114+
"acceptedAnswer": {
115+
"@type": "Answer",
116+
"text": "Use intake contracts with validations, tier supplier onboarding, maintain a versioned factor catalog (valid-from/valid-to), store rule/factor versions with each run, and reconcile ERP totals with model inputs using a short period report."
117+
}
118+
},
119+
{
120+
"@type": "Question",
121+
"name": "Which controls map to SOC 2 and ISO 27001 for an ESG platform?",
122+
"acceptedAnswer": {
123+
"@type": "Answer",
124+
"text": "Access controls (RBAC/SoD, RLS, secret rotation), change management (PR reviews and gated releases), logging/monitoring (append-only audit events, OpenTelemetry to SIEM), and data governance (classification, retention, backups, vendor controls)."
125+
}
126+
},
127+
{
128+
"@type": "Question",
129+
"name": "How is XBRL tagging prepared on the backend?",
130+
"acceptedAnswer": {
131+
"@type": "Answer",
132+
"text": "Pin the ESRS taxonomy version, keep a concept-to-source-field mapping, make tagging deterministic, run pre-file iXBRL validation, and package an evidence bundle with validator outputs and the taxonomy checksum."
133+
}
134+
}
135+
]
136+
}
137+
]

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)