Skip to content

About the "3D + SAM" method mentioned in the paper: #36

@XXXCARREY

Description

@XXXCARREY

I notice that the best results on Class-agnostic evaluation on ScanNet200 are based on the "3D + SAM" model. Does this SAM refer to the original SAM? I checked the code, and it seems that the segmenter2d does not include an option for the original SAM; it only has options like Grounded-SAM, etc. Could you please tell me how to reproduce the highest-performing method mentioned in the paper? Thank you very much.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions