Skip to content

Generalize testing of data from tree sequences #101

Description

@molpopgen

We have relied too heavily on the notion of only analyzing nodes marked as "samples". While this is likely the most common thing to do, we should not be requiring this! (Unless we want to be less general than we could be). Our naive tests are only working for nodes marked as sample -- we should uncouple the testing methods from the sample-ness of nodes before moving on with, e.g., #100.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions